This article is written from a personal viewpoint and all statements made are either correct at the time of publication or an expression of opinion.

(Please note – this article is about Darren Greenham in Woodcroft, South Australia, ex-SAS (probably dishonourably discharged). It is NOT about Darren Greenham of Greenham Legal in Western Australia, a lawyer who is NOT an enemy of Autistics.)

I came across Darren Greenham when he attacked me while I was fighting against fools who were wanting raw milk deregulated even after a child died after consuming some. It was on a page from a story that the ABC put on Facebook about the rightful decision by the state government to add a bittering agent to raw milk to make sure it wasn’t drunk.

Greenham at first was just generally disruptive with comments like;

I wish they’d regulate your use of social media
(In response to me telling someone else that the regulation was needed because there were too many idiots about)

Well said, Comrade with a thumbs up at the end
(In response to me telling someone else that idiots need to have the right to choose taken away from them – Greenham’s comment was clearly sarcastic)

To you
(In reponse to me telling someone else that something was irrelevant – and it was, talking about what fast food does to people and mentioned the lack of exercise)

I can take that. I responded appropriately, or I was beaten to it by someone else and I thought he’d shut up.

But when I was challenged by a witch named Janet Torrance, I got a PM from him and I knew straight away this guy was a fool. Torrance mentioned vaccines causing Autism and I jumped on her good and proper for it. She mentioned Hannah Poling, and so did Greenham. This is how the conversation went in PM after I told him that Hannah was already Autistic and suffered a sensory overload – his comments are in red and my replies at the times are in blue;

Haha, ok, perhaps they should have called you as a witness in the court case? It was determined based on all available evidence that the vaccines she received caused her Autism. Fact.

Fiction. No mention was made of Autism causation. It was a clash between the five vaccines in the one hit and Mitocondrial Dysfunction. It was a regression. Fact.

Forgetting for the moment that there was no hearing. The government conceded the matter based on no oral evidence.

Yes, thank you for acknowledging it was the vaccines that caused the regression. No vaccines, no regression! Fact.

I will save and share your admission, thank you. It proves you have no idea what you are talking about.

That pissed me right off in the first section, and he’s the one who doesn’t know what he’s talking about and that’s addressed later.

FICTION! If the stupid doctor hadn’t done what he did there wouldn’t be a problem. It was the DOCTOR! NOT the vaccine! It’s the perfect example of why there shouldn’t be a no fault system.

The response to this was just beyond belief!

Ah hahaha! How was it the Doctor!? It was the vaccines! The Doctor simply administered them!?

Fact.

I got really angry at that point, and;

Idiot. [beep!] off, liar, you are an Autistic Enemy.

I started to take the screenshots that made up this article. I also looked at his home page, and his groups indicated he was an Adelaide resident. I also saw that he was a Mary Tocco follower! I then looked him up in the White Pages and I think I got him – in Woodcroft not far from Morphett Vale. I also suspected he is a friend of Alisa Cooney. While I was taking screenshots, Greenham shot back with this.

Haha, you are clueless! I’m not the enemy, I’m all about saving kids from the same fate! You claim to be Autistic? I’ve seen you on You Tube…who have you the diagnosis? People like you make the general population think Autistic people are all high functioning and able to live a somewhat normal existence…the reality for many is that they are still in nappies at 20 and self harming…you are the enemy you shill. Fact.

I hadn’t completed the screenshots yet and it was my intention to end the conversation with this comment.

Fiction. You want Autism blamed on vaccines and doing more harm than good and getting in the way of understanding the Autistic Spectrum. All of it. High and low functioning. Autism is genetic. Fact. Vaccines do not cause it. Careless doctors may cause regressions but that’s as far as it goes.

One more thing;

And I linked the 2014 article from Sydney Uni that showed that vaccines did NOT cause Autism.

I would add that his comment “who have you the diagnosis” is appalling grammar! I think he may have been questioning it. I have been formally diagnosed as all readers know.

Greenham wouldn’t quit. As I tried to finish off the screenshots he fired back again;

You’re a very confused individual! If Autism is ‘genetic’ how have children who have regressed AFTER VACCINES recovered from their ‘regression’ by way of dietary changes and supplementation etc? And if Autism is in fact ‘genetic’ as you claim, why aren’t all kids screened prior to vaccination so those identified a saving the “Autism Gene’ (lol) can be spared the vaccine induced regression? Can you explain to me a little more how it’s the Doctors causing the regressions and not the vaccines? Because last I heard, Doctors administer the vaccine, the vaccine enters the body, the Doctor does not? He simply pushes the needle in, the vaccine does the rest. Fact.

So much wrong with that, but I got around to addressing it later. He then attacked the Uni link;

That ‘study’ is bunk, it includes the Danish study which was headed by a still wanted Felon who siphoned MILLIONS from research funding! It’s a joke, I can link you to countless studies identifying Vaccine/Autism link but you’re nothing more than a shill so I won’t waste my time.

No doubt he would have tried Ginger Taylor’s fist full of cow manure. I did address the Poul Thorsen reference, but first he got in with this as I was still catching up with screenshots;

Thanks for the chat, I’ll be sure to screen shot and post some of your comments, especially this masterpiece…

He then quoted me from above starting with fiction in capital letters but he left off the last sentence. I got him back with this;

Every single one of them is pseudo science and easily bunked. I’m not a shill. I’m the genuine article. Proof that Autism is genetic and not in any way shape or form caused by vaccines. Judging that Danish study on a separate criminal act is convenient – look at the study, not the person.

And all Greenham could come back with was;

Haha, who’s to say the study was even conducted! It’s alleged he was too busy buying houses and Harleys.

Oh it was conducted alright. The CDC have a copy and withdrew it from publication when Thorsen’s folly was revealed. Another idiot named Brian Hooker knew it existed and he’s been chucking FOI after FOI at the CDC to get the full study out again! I simply said on Facebook;

The experts at Sydney Uni have confirmed it was good work.

In other words, they wrote the article – which they wouldn’t have done if the study was bunk.

You’re a very confused article, that’s what you are.

He was clearly not listening so I went back to the start;

Autism is genetic – because it hasn’t been proved that it’s not and it never will be. The genetic link is there – and the condition predates vaccine existence. 1797 in France is the earliest recorded Autistic.

Greenham appeared to ignore me as he went back to my previous comment about Sydney Uni;

You mean the indoctrinated experts who know no different to what they’ve been fed since they were students themselves? Those experts?

Greenham obviously doesn’t understand the university education qualification and what it entails, and I shovelled the obvious right back at him;

Experts who are trained properly. Not know nothing fools like you who probably went to Google University.

Greenham then caught up and addressed my genetic comment;

What’s the Gene that causes Autism? Why aren’t all kids screened prior to vaccination if as you claim vaccines cause regression in those with this defective gene?

Oh I missed that last bit at the time! DEFECTIVE?? We are NOT defective, you bastard! We are DIFFERENT! I was actually in start again mode and the first paragraph of my next comment reflected this – here’s where I addressed something from earlier;

Doctors who administer vaccines incorrectly are at fault. Not the vaccines themselves. Five on the one visit for poor Hannah with mitocondrial dysfunction was an error by the doctor.

There is no single gene!! It’s complex and the key has not been found yet. And I hope it’s not because that will lead to abortions like it has with Down’s Syndrome.

That caused Greenham to be a hypocrite and defend the doctor;

And you think that’s a one off! Haha! That’s common especially if they need to ‘catch up’ to get back on the ‘schedule’.

I quickly shot back;

DON’T catch up!! Not for a kid with mitocondrial dysfunction!!

I got him with that one because he diverted to another issue trying to be clever, and I won’t quote this time because I don’t need to. He wanted an explanation for the jump in the prevalence rate. That was easy – the DSM-IV and I said so. So he jumped back to the previous point with this junk;

But Doctors recommend catching up, as does the CDC!

You see the issue here!?

I didn’t say it and I should have in reply. Some states in the US mandate it and that’s wrong. The freedom should be there under the circumstances to take one’s time if there’s an issue. Doctors who stick to recommendations like glue are doing the wrong thing. What I did say was;

No, because it’s not mandated.

I think I got him again so he went back to the ‘admission’ I made about regressions.

You openly acknowledged that vaccines cause regression in susceptible individuals.

I was already typing an addition to my previous comment so I added that first and then the second paragraph.

Doctors HAVE to be careful. It’s their job.

Regression is not the same as causation.

Now here’s where the earlier ‘admission’ is defined and you’ll see just how moronic this guy is and why he’s an enemy of Autistics;

How so? of course it is.

To which I shot back;

Look the two words up in the dictionary and then tell me it’s the same!!

It was at that point that I concentrated on finishing the screenshots while he came back with this junk;

Regression…1.
a return to a former or less developed state.

Right…so at what stage was the child who displayed no Autistic traits prior to vaccination in this less developed state?

Less developed ‘Autistic’ state?

Causation…the act of causing something.

For example, a child dying or exhibiting Autistic traits in the immediate hours or days following a vaccination.

I’m off, thanks for the chat.

I saw that and I knew I had him. It is impossible for a child to be Autistic when they weren’t beforehand. For a regression to happen, the child HAS to be Autistic to start with – from birth. Now because it can only be diagnosed based on behaviours, it’s not possible to do a proper diagnosis at that early stage. But as shown in the Michelle Cedillo case, it can be done to an extent. I addressed everything in my final comment;

You have no idea. Regression means regressing from the high end of the Spectrum to the low end. Always on the Spectrum no matter what.

Causation means going from off the Spectrum to on the Spectrum. Vaccines do NOT cause the latter and never have. They can cause the former but ONLY if the child is already on the Spectrum AND the vaccines should NOT have been administered at that time – either because the child was sick, or had some other condition that could react to the vaccine. THAT is what the doctor should be checking for!

You’ve given me more than enough evidence. You are an Autistic Enemy and oppose the true understanding of the Autistic Spectrum – high and low functioning. I support everyone on the Spectrum and seek to help whenever I can. I am in pursuit of those fake reports with a final smashing of them by the experts. This is being done prove that vaccines are safe and do not cause Autism. I know they don’t. It didn’t cause mine. I know more about it than you do and I always will because I have taken the time to understand it. I have to being on the Spectrum myself. Ignoring it is lethal.

And with that I blocked him.

The last sentence was a reference to Adam Lanza, who rejected his Autistic diagnosis outright. He flatly refused to adjust and it drove him insane. We all know what happened then. Greenham would allow that to happen because he doesn’t respect the condition in it’s entirety. He only ‘respects’ one part of it, and that’s useless because it’s not the full story. Never has been and never will be. So his respect is fake.

Darren Greenham is an enemy of Autistics. He can’t deny it in the face of the truth of the origins of Autism. A condition that requires you to avoid sensory overload, and if you don’t you have to reverse it in childhood (early intervention). You’ll never get a child off the Spectrum entirely. But you can get them out of nappies and up to a level resembling mine.

Fact.

(With apologies to Tyson Kidd!)

PHIL GLUYAS