This article is a work in progress as it relates to Wikipedia (including notes) and his 2019 book. Some Wikipedia references no longer work due to deletions.
Yuval Levental is an Autistic person who studied in France and lives in East Lansing, Michigan in the United States.[1][2]
Background
Levental was born in either 1992 or 1993 and was originally diagnosed with Asperger syndrome in the summer of 2008 at the age of 15.[3] Levental originally believed in the proper definition of neurodiversity, but after not becoming the genius he expected to be[4] he dumped the concept and has more recently been trying to promote it as a damaging belief. He claimed that he didn’t adjust to his condition for five years from the ages of 15 to 20, proven by the assertion that “I was told for years by various individuals that it was my own fault that I couldn’t keep up with the growing amounts of work.”[5] It was his fault for not seeking the help he needed to overcome that problem. Despite this issue, he claims to have graduated from East Lansing High School in 2010 “with honors”, as well as achieving a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering (again “with honors”) and a Master’s Degree in electronics from ESIEE in Paris, France, as well as previously taking courses in Communication Systems, Electromagnetic Compatibility, Senior Design, Electromagnetics and Biomedical Signal Processing at Michigan State University.[2] He would not have achieved this if he had not been on the Autistic spectrum. He also claims to be taking potassium supplements to help with his Autism,[6] when in fact there is no proof of such assistance existing.
Neurodiversity
Levental doesn’t believe in the science of neurodiversity, and claims it harms Autistics using Jonathan Mitchell as an example.[7] He started a site on Wikia called “Exposing Neurodiversity”, but he abandoned it when he was challenged on his views (that Wikia was subsequently merged with the Autism Wikia). His chief goal appears to be to prove his views to be correct. Thus far he has failed to do so.
Levental had an article published at Techrights.com referencing Microsoft’s support for diversity in employment of Autistics.[8] This could be argued as Microsoft engaging the Autistic community in recognising the Neurodiversity concept. However, Levental attacked this, concluding that “While this program will help some people with autism, it is more a way for Microsoft to gain attention for glorifying autism as being an advantage than to find a genuine way to resolve the problems of most autistic individuals.”[9]
Levental’s attitude to neurodiversity was best demonstrated on Oliver Canby’s Autism is Bad blog in the entry “Neurodiversity Amendment”.[10] In the comments on November 29, 2015, Levental stated “A better amendment would be to make Autism illegal, and the punishment would be a forcible cure or attempted cure.”[11] This would effect the eugenic elimination of the Autistic community.
Newsweek article comments
Levental participated in the now hidden comments on the Newsweek article about Jonathan Mitchell.
The principles of neurodiversity have no scientific evidence, or at least no strong scientific evidence. This could be really harmful for people like Jonathan Mitchell and myself.
A commenter named Nate Watkins disputed this.
actually, it’s not healthy to believe that autism should be “cured”. autism usually gives great memory, intelligence and sense of detail. actually, there is scientific evidence coming out now that autism may just be part of someone.
Levental had very little in reply.
Show me the scientific proof.
He was told by Watkins that there was no evidence that Autism was an illness. He also linked a request to participate in a study into Autistic thinking. Levental avoided this.
I meant research on Autistic brains, memory tests compared to NTs, proof that Autism is a gift.
The reality is that the proof lies in the behavioural traits and not in the physical brain – because every individual human brain is different. William Lane made the following accurate remark that Levental ignored.
My autism has given me incredible analytic ability and a healthy respect for rules. Surely that can be positive, no?
The only thing Levental was able to say was a repeat on a previous observation.
But all I ask for is more scientific evidence.
He also compared Autism to other conditions inappropriately.
So dyslexia, depression, cancer are gifts too??
The negativity being presented about Autism with this comment is offensive and goes to one of the many examples why Levental is an enemy of the Autistic community
Wikipedia
1. 2015
Levental started editing under the account Ylevental by appearing to create an article on Dixon D. White, judging by the message left on his talk page advising of it’s speedy deletion.[12] He then appeared to start an argument over whether or not Elliot Rodger was a member of the Men’s Rights Movement,[13] before getting involved in the article Gamergate controversy by trying to include an article that questioned the existence of a study.[14] His edit was reverted,[15] and the user who reverted it noted the creation of the White article was the perpetation of a deliberate hoax per a link on Reddit.[16][17] He added that Levental couldn’t be trusted.[18] Levental played suck up in reply trying to get the edit accepted,[19] and another editor pointed out that the person who wrote the link wasn’t “a big name in data”.[20] Levental shot back that the writer of another article wasn’t either and the writer even admitted it[21] only to be told off that the claim was misleading.[22] But Levental wouldn’t take the hint and continued to press for his edit albeit not forcefully.[23] Another user pointed out a serious issue about article balance[24] and then added a criticism of Levental’s edit as unencyclopedic as well as referencing the Reddit note without naming it, and pointing out that the writer was not a data scientist but a journalist.[25] Levental’s next comment after a bunch of other comments still tried to put over the writer as “experienced”, refusing to take any of the previous points into account.[26] The section has since been changed extensively.
But on May 10, 2015, Levental started his promotion of his friend Jonathan Mitchell by creating an article about him, incorporating in the first edit a biased claim that Mitchell’s website articles on Undiagnosing Albert Einstein, Bill Gates and Thomas Jefferson and neurodiversity were “notable”.[27] It didn’t take long for his bias to start being removed[28], but it took awhile for the notability of the article to be challenged.[29] Meanwhile though, Levental then added Mitchell’s views to the Neurodiversity article’s criticism section.[30] He did the same thing to the Autism Rights movement article.[31] This blatant promotion was not challenged at this point.
On May 30, 2015, Levental started editing the Autism article adding reports to the other symptoms section about different facial features and lung issues being related to Autism.[32] He added the lung issue to the causes section.[33] These edits were reverted as not being compliant with Wikipedia’s medical source rules.[34] Levental reverted that back[35] only for another user to restore the reversion.[36] That caused Levental to go to the talk page to try and enforce his point of view and it didn’t go well for him at all.[37] He even admits to not being able to find anything “for my purpose” – imputing a biased agenda as well as clearly refusing to acknowledge the difference between primary sources and secondary sources.
It would appear that Levental may not have coped with this very well and stopped editing until the end of December, when he targeted the Retrospective diagnoses of Autism article – in particular the diagnosis of Albert Einstein. He started by introducing commentary by Thomas Sowell and the mythical Einstein Syndrome without a source[38] and then adding the unsourced statement that Einstein wasn’t Autistic.[39] He finally added a source[40] and then he added another comment from Walter Isaacson including a source[41] not realising that Autistics can have close friends, passionate relationships, intelligent discussions and empathy in certain circumstances. He then added Dr Stephen Camarata to the Sowell commentary[42] and that was promptly reversed by another user as unsourced.[43] Levental put the claim back with a source[44] and this did continue in to 2016.
Meanwhile challenges were now coming for the Mitchell article. A Conflict of Interest tag had been added to it for instance[45] and Levental removed it along with his biased essay claim that had also been challenged.[46] He also re-created an article on Einstein Syndrome.[47] But the COI was already on the talk page, with comments spilling into 2016.[48] Levental also started an attack on Wrong Planet by removing a comment with it as a source from the Temple Grandin article.[49] This was promptly reverted[50] but Levental removed it again claiming Wrong Planet was unreliable.[51] That was also reverted by another user stating that there was no issue with Wrong Planet as a source[52] but Levental refused to take the hint and removed it again using as his source a Wrong Planet article that he said was wrong[53] (when it wasn’t). This was reverted yet again and Levental was told that if he had an issue with it go to the talk page and discuss it.[54] Levental never did.
Instead, he switched focus. The first thing he did was the first of three blatantly promotional efforts to get the Mitchell article listed as a featured article,[55] before starting to edit on the articles on Asperger syndrome, John Elder Robison, Amanda Baggs, Autism Network Interational, Amy Sequenzia, Jim Sinclair and Autism National Committee. For Asperger syndrome, Levental tried to downplay the significance of an Autistic boy stacking cans by removing a possible and perfectly valid explanation.[56] He did the same with the next two edits replacing strong but valid words with weaker ones, again trying to downplay significance.[57][58] But then he added more negativity from Jaarsma and Welin as well as invoking Mitchell yet again.[59] This biased editing remains today.
With John Elder Robison, Levental compacted the article taking out headers before adding the claim that Robison was self diagnosed.[60] But he then removed it and nominated the article for speedy deletion claiming Robison was not significant,[61] or rather not wanting him having an article on Wikipedia. This was rightly declined,[62] and Levental promptly put the self diagnosis claim back again.[63] Thankfully the source was noted as “unpublished” and removed accordingly.[64] With Amanda Baggs, Levental added the conspiracy theory that others had used to question her diagnosis as Autistic.[65] He added another conspiracy claim on the back of that,[66] but that one was reverted.[67] With Autism Network International Levental made the first of a number of biased nominations for deletion but he then changed it for another speedy deletion attempt[68] only to have that declined.[69] With Amy Sequenzia, Levental tried for yet another speedy deletion[70] only to have that declined.[71] He did the same with Jim Sinclair[72] and that went the same way.[73] It was the same also with the Autism National Committee.[74]
It was at this point that Levental went to work on a page in the Wikipedia space, High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors – an essay about the Spectrum designed to educate users in case they come across other users who were on the Spectrum. He started with highly opinionated edits adding remarks like “eye color doesn’t handicap a person”, misunderstanding the original analogy, a personal example of the Gamergate controversy, having a crack at Bernie Sanders, “No citation needed, Hollywood said so!”, and adding Mitchell again – while at the same time removing references to differences and neurodiversity including an offensive reference that differences are “redundant”, and removing a middle option on data processing – all in one edit with the inaccurate edit summary of “Facts and reasoned arguments, as to why autism is a terrible thing”.[75] He then changed the image on the page in what was a clear error,[76] he fixed it to make it clear that he was pressing his views again labelling the picture with the text “Ignorance of employment outcomes of autism. I’m sure severe autistics are just Einsteins in disguise.”[77] He then removed the second sentence,[78] before adding to the nutshell that Autistics were “just not as smart”, while re-adding the original text to the image without deleting his ignorance comment.[79] Thankfully that was all reverted by another user.[80] Levental responded by adding a disclaimer which was manifestly wrong[81] and then added to it[82] before another user took it out again.[83] Levental clearly didn’t like that and went to the user’s talk page and presented his negativity about Autism.[84] The user responded rightly accusing him of pushing a point of view and adding unsourced original research as well as needing to put this issue on the talk page of the essay.[85] Despite this, Levental went back to the essay and made edits to try and undermine Autism diagnosis by removing rightful generalising.[86] Then he inexplicably added an error template about the talk page of the essay[87] before removing it while adding the word “legal” to a diagnosis, imputing that a diagnosis had legal requirements.[88] Then he tried a ridiculous page move to Certain High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors.[89] That was reverted by another user[90] who then started a section on the essay’s talk page critcising Levental’s editing.[91] Levental backpedalled in reply but he still wanted a disclaimer, causing the user who started the section to have a go at him for the suggestions reviewing edit summaries and basically ending that issue.
2. 2016 (January/February)
In January 2016, Levental returned to the Jonathan Mitchell article and added Mitchell’s personal article as a source regarding Bill Gates not being Autistic.[92] He then added a note from an already noted source about neuroscience,[93] before adding a lot more content relying on the Newsweek article and a couple of others.[94] Then he added a biased note; “He is one of the most controversial voices in the Autism blogosphere”,[95] and added to it with a bogus reflection on the source (the Newsweek article)[96] while adding another biased note about the number of entries at the time on Mitchell’s Autism Gadfly blog.[97] Then he added another biased quote from New York Magazine,[98] a claim from another blogger about Mitchell’s bitterness[99] and an expansion of his interest in neuroscience from the Newsweek article.[100] After all that he went to the Wikipedia Teahouse and looked for an opinion on it.[101] There is no record of a reply. Levental went back to the Mitchell article and added another biased claim about parent’s expectations of savant abilities,[102] reflecting on his own former view in the process.[4] He also expanded on Mitchell’s views on his work history,[103] and then breached Mitchell’s privacy by nominating in public the money he got from his parents.[104]
Another user finally identified the Conflict of Interest issue taking out a lot of the page’s content[105] and tagging the article as subject to COI.[106] He also issued a warning on Levental’s talk page[107] and added to a thread on the Mitchell article’s talk page.[108] Levental removed the tag[109] and then reverted the other edit,[110] before going to the talk page and lying by denying any conflict.[111] There was a brief edit war on the Mitchell article before the other user sent the Mitchell article for deletion (claiming a false start over using the wrong template).[112] Levental was asked by an established user for a statement on the issue consequent to other deleted comments[113] and he back flipped and confessed.[114] But in spite of this admission he persisted in editing the Mitchell article.[115][116] As an excuse, he responded to a request on his own talk page that he would apply for a peer review[117] but he then persisted with his editing anyway with these four edits,[118] followed by these two[119] and then another eleven.[120]
After all that he went to the peer review, but instead of having his own edits reviewed – he looked to have the Mitchell article reviewed instead with the intention of Wikipedia front page exposure[121] in a blatant promotional effort. He even tried to get three other users on board.[122][123][124] The first advised he wasn’t an expert in the field[125] and the second didn’t react. The third told him to wait for the AfD to conclude.[126] Noting that, Levental went to the Administrator’s noticeboard wanting the AfD closed due to the number of keep votes as well as believing (incorrectly) that people weren’t editing it because of the deletion tag.[127] He then added a note about an IP, and wanted the page protected from deletion.[128] After a few more peer review requests, he tried to get the AfD speedily deleted.[129] That of course didn’t work, but the ruling was Keep anyway.[130] Levental quickly removed the tag from the Mitchell page accordingly.[131] He then gave up on the peer review and closed it.[121] But he didn’t stop editing the Mitchell article.[132] This included removing the COI template which another user was quick to restore.[133] This led up to Levental nominating the article as a featured article for the second time.[134]
Levental then went after John Elder Robison again, this time removing uncited claims on the page of his book Look me in the eye[135] – fine under Wikipedia rules but convenient. He did the same thing to the Robison article.[136] Both were reverted by the same IP with cites added to the first one.[137][138] Levental reverted the Robison reversion demanding a source[139] but the IP put it back claiming one wasn’t needed as Robison opposed a cure.[140] Luckily Levental realised his error and to cover for his annoyance he moved the claim into the previous source.[141] He also added an unsourced claim to Wrong Planet[142] that was quickly reverted.[143]
Back on the Mitchell article, the same IP as before added a neutrality tag as well as removing a source as a blog.[144] Levental reverted the second part claiming it was a news blog and therefore an exception.[145] The IP removed the source again denying the exception[146] but Levental put it back trying to qualify it as notable as an education writer.[147] The IP again removed the source rightly calling that irrelevant[148] and Levental reverted it yet again calling it a news blog as though it made it right.[149] Nothing happened after that, possibly because the IP was aware of the three revert rule.
An IP meanwhile removed both the COI tag and the neutrality tag.[150] Another IP put it back identifying it as Levental socking.[151] The investigation didn’t go anywhere[152] but I can confirm that it had to be either him or a meat puppet. The IP resolved to Levental’s French university Ecole Superieure d’Ingenieurs en Electrotechnique et Electronique – ESIEE.[153] Another IP also listed on the same SPI (Sock Puppet Investigation) removed them again[154] and an established user put them back.[155] This second IP was also French.[156] Levental came back with his account and removed them yet again.[157] He then went to the Aspies for Freedom article and removed a section combining it with another.[158]
Levental then took a short break until the end of January when he was at it again on the Mitchell article. The neutrality and COI tags had been put back in his absence and he removed them yet again with the edit summary “unless you can describe constructive reasons for putting those tags, it is pointless”.[159] Another IP put it back with the edit summary “you admitted to COI, neutrality issue on talk page”.[160] Levental removed it again making the irrelevant and incorrect claim “This was two weeks ago, it has been fixed”.[161] The IP reverted that rightly stating “no it hasn’t and the COI never will”.[162] Stubborn as ever, Levental put it back yet again stating “Then fix it as needed and the COI tag is only used for when the COI creates a biased article”.[163] Equal to Levental’s stubborn conduct, the IP put it back stating “neutrality issue equals biased article”[164] and then added pressure by rightly removing a blog as a source as well as adding a couple of fact tags to claims that needed proof.[165] Levental removed the tags while agreeing about the blog, but at the same time removed the neutrality and COI tags yet again.[166] The IP reverted the lot stating “not(sic) it’s not – cite sources or I’ll remove the claims under WP:BLP”.[167] The IP was citing the rule that prohibited unsourced claims from biographies of living persons (BLP) and demanded their immediate removal. Levental backed this up in the next edit summary stating “The information about the controversial status is clearly in the Newsweek article. The NPR article quoted says “employers thought he was too loud, made too many mistakes”” while at the same time yet again removing the neutrality and COI tags.[168] A different IP compressed and lightened Mitchell’s views on neurodiversity,[169] but the previous IP reverted that for some reason while restoring all the tags (fact, neutrality and COI) claiming “both are opinion only – provide proper sources, and stop removing the tags”.[170] Levental reverted that stating “The other person already made the lede more neutral”.[171] That was true but he still shouldn’t have removed the neutrality and COI tags. Finally an established user got involved and restored order telling Levental to stop editing the article directly.[172]
Levental then decided to make a complaint to Wikipedia’s admin indicent report page[173] and was referred to SPI. It would appear nothing happened, which wasn’t surprising as the IP involved at this point was at the State Library of Victoria so proving sock puppetry was impossible as that is a very public internet terminal. The article was worked on by others and the tags removed, only for Levental to use this to make his third attempt to get Mitchell’s article promoted as a featured article.[174] As before it failed.
It was at this point that Leveantal started his controversial editing of the Black Pride article. He firstly used an archived article from Salon dot com to press it as a negative label,[175] but then he tried to prod it for deletion.[176] He may have seen the result – the notice that it had previously been nominated for deletion, and that caused him to change the edit to a nomination for deletion,[177] before creating the AfD.[178] It did not go well for him at all, with one editor calling him out “and considering this edit summary at Talk:White pride as evidence of WP:DLS suitable sanctions for the nominator”.[179] DLS means Dislike of the Subject. Prior to this Levental removed what he called unsourced claims and absence of mentions.[180][181][182] The comment on the talk page of White Pride which was referenced on the Black Pride deletion discussion was also during this period,[183] and upon seeing another user reverted all of Levental’s edits on the Black Pride article with the accurate edit summary “Ylevental made a racist statement on the white pride talkpage, so i do not trust that user’s edits”.[184] Levental reverted it with the edit summary “There is nothing racist about the accomplishments of white people. Now properly add citations to the article”.[185] The other user reverted back stating “sorry, i can’t trust that your edits are made in good faith. you are obviously biased”.[186] I would have said racist again because it was clear imputation of it. Indeed on the talk page an IP went there.[187] Levental called it an ad-hominem attack when reverting the established user’s edit again although he was right about the AfD box.[188] It was reverted back again and this time the established user went the racist accusation stating “a racist white person is making massive deletions on the black pride page, and proposing the page itself be deleted?”[189] The user then realised his error over the AfD box and put it back,[190] before using a cosmetic correction to add “it’s not an ad hominem attack. you identified yourself as a racist with this statement” linking the White Pride talk page comment.[191] Levental’s response was to appeal to the authority of Wikipedia policy while removing it all yet again.[192] The other user reverted it again while adding Citation needed tags in order to get the issue fixed.[193] Levental though refused to quit, re-adding the Salon.com article[194] before undermining the meaning of Black Pride by spectrumising it in effect.[195] He then removed more material claiming no mention and a trivial mention only respectively.[196][197] Another established user reverted it appropriately.[198] Over on the White Pride article meanwhile Levental added a cited note about someone trying to trademark “White Pride Country Wide” failing due to racism and yet Black Pride and Black Power had such trademarks.[199] The note has since been removed at an unknown time.
Levental’s next point of view attack was to re-create the article Einstein Syndrome over the redirect to a different spelling.[200] The point of it was to try and promote Einstein as not being Autistic, through the views of Thomas Sowell and Darold Treffert. In order to back this up he added the note about superior mathematical skills and problem solving.[201] Another user reviewed it and added tags for link rot, orphaned article and reference improvement as well as no categories.[202] Levental didn’t like the orphan tag and removed it,[203] and he then removed the link rot tag calling it “not true”.[204] The other user restored both tags[205][206] and then proved that link rot existed by rescuing three links from archive.org.[207][208] That done, the user removed the link rot tag.[209] Levental removed the orphan tag again, pointing to his recent add of a link on the Retrospective diagnoses of autism.[210][211] He then tried to claim that Einstein Syndrome had no relationship to Autism[212] and an IP jumped on this lie and prodded the article for deletion.[213] Levental reverted that stating the difference in the edit summary without proof,[214] because there isn’t any. For some reason, Levental went to Requests for undeletion going in to bat for keeping the article when it was still there at the time.[215]
He was then back on the Black Pride article removing uncited material barely giving anyone time to find them.[216] That was reverted and the reverting user told Levental to go to the talk page as he was told he was acting in bad faith.[217] Levental never did go to the talk page – and after the other user did some work, Levental removed an uncited section again.[218] The other user promptly restored it.[219] Levental then added a citation needed tag to another comment[220] before adding a reference to the Black Panthers putting them over as completely violent.[221] Thankfully that was his last edit on that page and the edit has since been removed at an unknown time. The warning put on his talk page explains this lack of activity.[222]
Levental was also active on the White Pride article again, adding a note from Steve Sailer[223] and a horrific article about Hispanics having a “White Appreciation Day” and the reaction including a bomb threat.[224] The second edit was reverted as “not notable and tangential”[225] but Levental got worse firstly removing a citation needed tag without adding a cite,[226] and then softening the lede as though having white pride was good.[227][228] He then tried to replace the picture with a logo – the Stormfront Logo[229] representing a white nationalist, white supremacist, antisemitic, Holocaust denial, neo-Nazi Internet forum, and the Web’s first major racial hate site, and it wouldn’t show. Levental then added quotes that also normalised white pride, from Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton[230] and Janet Helms.[231] Finally someone twigged and reverted the lot and told Levental to discuss the changes on the talk page.[232] Levental put it all back claiming reliable sources and mentioning the lack of citations in the Black Pride article,[233] but then he changed his mind[234] and went to the talk page to make his point.[235] Another user played an analogy back at him[236] and Levental claimed to understand but gave notice of restoring one of the edits[237] which he did after the talk page edit and not before as claimed, re-adding the Helms quote.[238] But then he added what was clearly an editorial opinion[239] and another user rightly removed it as uncited,[240] although it was naive to claim it was in good faith given Levental’s history. Levental did one more edit, changing “slogan” to “motto”[241] and that was all. The article has since changed markedly.
But Levental also edited the White Privilege article, starting with an uncited remark that looked like an opinion.[242] He then added its source, the Washington Post[243] and added the proper citation template.[244] He then added a quote from Peggy McIntosh in the New Yorker.[245] Another user changed to wording of the claim from the Washington Post source, making the point in the edit summary “what the source actually says; attributing an opinion column to its author, since it’s not a reliable source for facts”.[246] For the record, Levental added the McIntosh quote to the article on her[247] and the quote is still there today even if the surrounding text has changed.
Levental was soon back on the Retrospective diagnoses of Autism page and started adding Adolf Hitler.[248] Even more offensively, he promoted Hitler ahead of Isaac Newton.[249] He even replaced Nikola Tesla’s picture with the Nazi leader.[250] Another user put Hitler last instead, using chronological order[251], while a different user removed the section on him under SPOV (Scientific Point Of View) and sock puppetry.[252] Not the reason I would have given and the beginning note and the picture were still there. Levental reverted that stating the source was “perfectly reliable”[253] but a few days later an IP reverted it.[254] Levental put it back stating he was going to add more sources[255] and he added one from Andreas Fries[256] who from what I can tell has no relevant qualifications whatsoever. Another IP removed the source and the Hitler section calling it all unreliable and speculation.[257] Levental put it back again claiming the source had been used elsewhere in the article[258] but another IP removed it again calling Fitzgerald unreliable in this case (I disagree – it was Fries who was not reliable) but also calling it undue weight.[259] Yet again Levental put it back claiming Fitzgerald was unreliable if he was the only source and Fries backed that up, as well as wanting opposition to the diagnosis added.[260]
But all that must have lit the blue touch paper for Levental. Just two days later, he nominated the Retrospective diagnoses of Autism for deletion.[261] He followed that with a deletionist binge also nominating Jim Sinclair,[262] Autism Network International,[263] Autistic Self Advocacy Network, [264] Amy Sequenzia,[265] Aspies for Freedom,[266] Wrong Planet,[267] John Elder Robison[268] and Autistic Pride Day.[269] He even tried to set some of these up by removing what he called unreliable sources from the articles on Robison [270] and Sinclair,[271] while also attacking the articles on Ari Ne’eman[272] and Temple Grandin[273] in a similar way. All those deletion attempts failed.
3. 2016 (March – June)
In March, Levental returned to the Jonathan Mitchell article and made another promotional attempt, this time trying to nominate it as a good article.[274] An IP took it out citing Conflict of Interest again (and rightly),[275] but Levental put it back claiming that he could do what he liked with the talk page despite the COI.[276] The IP removed it again telling Levental that what he couldn’t do was nominate the article as a good article.[277] Levental stubbornly put it back demanding to see the rule that prevented him from doing it,[278] but then he changed his mind and removed it.[279]
Meanwhile he was continuing to remove material from the articles he had already nominated for deletion, including Wrong Planet,[280][281][282][283] Jim Sinclair,[284] Aspies for Freedom[285][286] and Retrospective diagnoses of autism.[287][288][289] The nominations finally came to the attention of established users and an incident report was made.[290] The AfD’s were noted as in bad faith and speedy keeps were called for. There seemed to be a general consensus of an existing issue but aside from dealing with the AfD’s nothing else was enforced.
Levental went back to the Einstein syndrome article and thought it had been deleted and looked to have the deletion reviewed.[291] It was pointed out that the article had “already been restored”,[292] so Levental went to the article and completely re-wrote it.[293][294] This was all about Levental trying to promote the idea that Einstein was not Autistic. The article at the time was in someone’s sandbox and Levental went back to the deletion review to advise what he’d done.[295] All subsequent edits were minor, and the article was later moved to the correct designation of “Late talker”.[296] This was because the term Einstein syndrome had been rendered more or less totally obsolete by the DSM-5, and therefore fake.
Levental went back to attacking the Wrong Planet article – which at the time was yet to be speedily kept as previously observed – firstly removing material that he had removed previously demanding “Please explain all reversions”.[297] An IP put the material back claiming vandalism,[298] but Levental removed it again claiming that Alex Plank was never sued and wanted proof.[299] An established user put it back again adding a source in the edit summary,[300] and had a rightful crack at Levental on his talk page about fact checking.[301] Levental’s excuse was that it wasn’t properly cited,[302] and yet he removed the material anyway, and did it again moments later under the guise of “I will fix the citations”.[303] Before anyone could react he re-added the lawsuit but removed the Guardian citation.[304] An IP then reacted and reverted everything back to the established users edit again citing vandalism,[305] but Levental stubbornly persisted again claiming citation fixes and also added dead links as an excuse.[306] An IP re-added the material again and told Levental to stop removing sourced information,[307] but still Levental persisted claiming that special education and dermatology were uncited and the Guardian source was removed again as well.[308] Unfortunately the article was protected at this point from edits outside administrators with Levental’s incorrect edit intact.[309]
Levental then went back to the Retrospective diagnoses of autism article and made a massive deletion edit claiming Wikipedia’s Coat Rack rule and also blatantly imputing an admission to removing material based on the positive promotion of Autism.[310] The Coat Rack rule is actually an essay about articles that are titled one thing but speak of something else,[311] which had no application here. That edit was reverted by an established user who pointed to the talk page for a discussion.[312] Levental did as he was told but it was clear in the discussion that he was still being stubborn.[313] As if to prove that while the discussion was still going on he re-added Adolf Hitler to the article, claiming that if Tesla was there per Fitzgerald so should Hitler.[314] An IP removed Hitler[315] and finally the picture was also removed.[316] The IP also removed the Fitzgerald sources from the Tesla section[317] Levental saw that as a green light to remove Tesla entirely,[318] while starting a new section on the talk page about Fitzgerald.[319] Delightfully as one can see, an IP came up with a source to back Tesla. The removal of the Tesla part of the article was reverted,[320] only for Levental to remove it again demanding a direct mention when it wasn’t needed.[321] An IP restored Tesla stating pretty much that point,[322] and then to back it up (as seen on the talk page) added a source.[323] Levental reacted by removing the first section again without removing Tesla entirely, repeating his same false claim about direct mention and invoking original research,[324] before removing some other notes that relied on Fitzgerald alone.[325] The IP put the Tesla note back again pointing out that the two sources go together,[326] but Levental removed it again demanding objectivity as well as the direct mention again.[327] The IP put it back again, clearly and rightly stating in the edit summary that “the auto biography makes the claim, the second source supports it as autism” as well as calling Levental out as biased.[328] Levental took it out again repeating his claim for a direct mention,[329] only for another established user to put it back for removal of cited information.[330] Despite that, Levental removed it again and at the same time added from the second source.[331] Another IP put it back again repeating the established user’s note about removing cited material.[332] At that point, much like Wrong Planet, the article was protected – this time with the right edit in place.[333]
As an aside, Levental’s Wrong Planet edit was reverted when the page was unprotected.[334] Another IP reversed that[335] (an IP suspiciously from Levental’s home town)[336] and another IP put it back again.[337] The suspicious IP removed the cited material again giving the same excuse as Levental did over non citation and dead links[338] only to have an established user revert him for an inaccurate edit summary and wanted a discussion.[339] None eventuated.
Levental meanwhile on his account created a new article on Thomas A McKean.[340] It only took a couple of hours for an established user to notice it and request a speedy deletion due to lack of credible claims to importance or significance.[341] Levental added a few more sources[342][343][344][345][346] in a desperate attempt to rescue to article while arguing for the article to be kept on the talk page.[347] He ended up having a win as the speedy was declined[348] but this was a bad development in relation to the truth about Autism being told, as McKean’s view is skewed by bad experience that he has failed to come to terms with much like Jonathan Mitchell – such as (as mentioned in the article on Wikipedia seen in previous notes) not speaking until he was 16, facing confusion over his condition, spending three years in a psychiatric institution and speaking of sensory sensitivities in a negative manner. Levental’s promotion of this man is consistent with his biased editing of Wikipedia. After creating a disambiguation page for Thomas McKean and doing a few more cosmetic things to the article like adding an info box and categories he took a break until April 2016.
On his return he created an article for John Elder Robison’s book, Switched on, albeit carelessly as he used the old Look me in the eye article as a template.[349] Nevertheless this was a change for Levental, promoting a book that was written by someone whose article Levental had tried to get deleted. He did fix it up after the page was tagged as a copyright violation.[350][351]
However he was soon back onto his bad habits again, this time on the article about Asperger syndrome. Levental removed mention of Vernon Smith, claiming he was self diagnosed.[352] An established user put it back stating a self diagnosis was not mentioned in the source,[353] only for Levental to remove it again citing a 2010 article in the edit summary (and changing the mention of Sanders to Hitler behind everyone’s back).[354] Another established user put it back again,[355] but instead of persisting Levental changed tack and added to the comment instead of removing it.[356] The note I put in brackets did get Levental into some trouble, and he explained it on two seperate talk pages as a script that automatically replaced certain words with “Hitler”.[357][358] It was a stupid script to use in any case and it should have been deleted on the spot and he didn’t. It would come back to haunt him.
Levental then started a dispute as to whether or not Hans Asperger called his subjects little professors by removing the reference from the articles on Asperger,[359] History of Asperger syndrome[360] and Professor[361] – citing a Google book search in each edit summary. The Professor edit was never restored. He then followed up on the Hans Asperger article with a bunch of edits[362] to include the controversial claim made about Asperger and his relationship with the Nazi’s as well as interpretations putting down Autism in general. He similarly made a bunch of changes to the History of Asperger syndrome article.[363] He also removed an internal link to Sociological and cultural aspects of autism on the Asperger Syndrome article[364] as well as an entire part of criticism giving priority to Jonathan Mitchell’s view.[365] Next he went to the Societal and cultural aspects of autism article (I suspect this was a later name change from the original just mentioned) and removed a preamble as unsourced as well as doing another Vernon Smith deletion for the same reason.[366] This removal unlike the other was never restored. He then went back to the Asperger syndrome article and undermined the attitude towards a cure by adding “some” to Autistics when at worst it’s “most”.[367] Another established user saw his promotion of Mitchell edit on the AS article and reverted it.[368]
Levental then went back to promoting Einstein syndrome again, adding it to the Pervasive developmental disorders template.[369] At the same time he also added a people section to the Autism resources template including Mitchell and McKean (and Sue Rubin).[370] The latter was reverted,[371] and the user brought it to the talk page.[372] The points made were excellent, and Levental’s response was weak to say the least[373] – and he then added the supposition that he didn’t know he’d be “looked down on” for it,[374] a pretty petty attempt at garnering sympathy. The established user saw that and responded accordingly with an appropriate call out.[375] The adding of the template to the pages on Mitchell and McKean[376][377] were both reverted.[378][379] Levental also adding a comment from Darold Treffert about Einstein syndrome to the Asperger Syndrome article.[380] This was quickly reverted IDing Einstein syndrome as a “proposed diagnosis”,[381] and quite rightly.
Levental’s next act was to create an article on Stephen Shore, which included another controversial claim that he supported taking mercury out of vaccines,[382] before going to the Asperger syndrome article and removing the little professors claim again as well as the opposition to Nazism.[383] A few days later he added another study as a source putting suicidal thoughts at 66 percent[384] in another attempt to paint the Spectrum negatively. An established user saw that and softened the tone while replacing the source with one that wasn’t primary.[385] Levental clearly didn’t like that and added a different statistic with a different source in the edit summary[386] to restore the negativity. Another established user reverted that and rightly.[387] Levental also returned to the Autism article and added facial features as a symptom with a source.[388] The source was a primary source again and was so reverted[389] but Levental persisted with an unsourced publication claim to back the primary source.[390] That was also reverted and Levental was told he didn’t understand Wikipedia’s medical source rules in effect and to go to the talk page with changes until he did.[391]
Levental then went to the Ari Ne’eman article and removed the claim that Ari stims as unsourced[392] and then added a criticism of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network.[393] An IP reverted that as unreliable, shifting a previous source forward covering the stimming claim.[394] The same source of criticism was already on the ASAN article and Levental added to that[395] only for an IP to remove that as well plus the rest as unreliable also.[396] After a few minor edits that were not controversial, Levental went on a deletion spree on the Asperger syndrome in popular culture article claiming fictional characters Gregory House of “House”,[397] Sheldon Collins of “Big Bang Theory”,[398], Mary Horowitz of “All about Steve”,[399], Temperance Brennan of “Bones”[400] and Eugene Porter of “The Walking Dead”[401] were not Autistic, while toning down Benedict Cumberbatch’s portrayal of Sherlock Holmes.[402] He then redirected the article to Autism spectrum disorders in the media.[403] This last act was consistent with an already existing proposal even though there was no discussion beyond that point.[404]
Prior to that, Levental went to the Autism spectrum disorders in the media page and added the movie “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close” without a reference to Autism[405] and added character Sonya Cross of “The Bridge” simply because of the unsourced claim that Alex Plank was hired as a consultant.[406] Consequent to the redirect, Levental added a new section questioning the validity of diagnosis of notable people[407] before tweaking it through multiple edits.[408] Meanwhile, he removed Asperger syndrome in popular culture from the Autism resources template[409] but without an edit summary and it was duly reverted by an established user,[410] who put a warning on Levental’s talk page.[411] For whatever the reason as it seemed so small, that seemed to trigger Levental and in a fit of pique he decided to vandalise Wikipedia with the aforementioned script by replacing “Hillary” with “Hitlery” and “Sanders” with “Hitler” again on the article on Ted Cruz’s 2016 Presidential campaign (while correcting a legitimate spelling mistake to try and hide it[412] – and got a 31 hour block for it.[413] Levental was a supporter of the campaign of Donald Trump[414] but for reasons unknown withdrew his support less than month before the election. This therefore appears to be suspicious behaviour showing not an Autistic enemy trait but rather a more general inability for a neutral point of view.
Levental went to the article on the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative and added an info box while removing the stub notification (prematurely at the time as it was still as stub really)[415] and then added some information with a source.[416] He followed up with more including two sources.[417] These edits seem to be okay but SFARI’s aims are somewhat cloudy and can be abused. Levental also added them to the Autism Resources template.[418] Amazingly Levental also added a criticism of Autism Speaks to it’s article re spending trends compared to ASAN and the Autism Science Foundation.[419]
But in June 2016 he was back to his biased ways again. On the talk page he spoke of the child stacking cans picture negatively to the point that he claimed there was no evidence that Autistics had “constructive specialized interests” whereas there were plenty of non Autistics who did.[420] This was a blatant insult against Autistic special interests that have many constructive uses. Levental then replaced the child image with that of Hans Asperger to back this up,[421] before removing a reference to high functioning Autistics in another blatant insult consistent with his talk page comment[422] and adding a rider insinuating that Uta Firth may have mistranslated Asperger’s work.[423] An established user reverted the image and caption change while simplifying the article (and maybe overdoing it)[424] and Levental partly reverted it, including the image and caption.[425][426] Another established user reverted that referencing a style matter that was addressed in the History of Asperger syndrome article.[427] In a totally dishonest move not dissimilar to his script stunt with the word ‘Hitler’, Levental reverted the image and caption again while also restoring references and categories and only mentioning the latter in the edit summary.[428] He then re-added a note that had been removed claiming he wasn’t sure it should be there or not.[429] Two established users brought the article back to where it was at a previous time, undoing all of Levental’s vandalism.[430][431] Levental didn’t get the hint and put back hs image and caption change[432] and it was quickly reverted by an established user invoking the need for a consensus.[433]
A mighty argument then ensued on the talk page of Asperger syndrome. The first section wasn’t much and at the bottom of it Jytdog told him again to wait for a consensus.[434] As also indicated an RFC (Request for Comment) was started. Levental supported it as did a few others.[435] It was the follow up discussion where Levental pressed his bias.[436] The image of Asperger’s copyright status was queried with one user pointing to it as in the process of being deleted at Wikimedia Commons. Levental claimed it was okay as a non free historic image and uploaded it to Wikipedia only to be called on the wrong date. It attracted an apology. He admitted that it might not qualify and the image was consequently deleted.[437] Knowing this was probably coming, Levental started a new RFC trying to ensure that the image he didn’t like didn’t return by proposed no lead image at all.[438] Initially this got some support until Patient Zero rightly identified Levental as having a temper tantrum as well as supporting the child stacking cans as appropriate. Levental struck back with a typically biased comment “there is no evidence that most people with Asperger’s necessarily have complex interests”[439] He tried to back that up with comments from Fred Volkmar[440] who criticised the DSM-V and in particular the merger of Autism and Asperger syndrome (and the other sub categories in the DSM-IV).[441] He was rightly criticised for this[442] so Levental needs a more reliable source. The user Permstrump owned him beautifully by quoting the DSM-IV-TR and also claiming that Volkmar had in fact not been contradicted at all.[443] Typically to protect his reputation, Levental backflipped partly but still insisted the word specialised wasn’t used (while creating a spelling mistake in Permstrump’s comment!) as well as claiming that molecular structures are complex and wide ranging.[444] Specialise is defined as “Concentrate on and become expert in a particular subject or skill.”[445] Restricted is defined as “Limited in extent, number, scope, or action.”[446] It is clear from this that the two words are closely related, contrary to Levental’s biased view, along with molecular structures in general still being a speciality and qualifies as restricted. Levental even tries to invoke “endless acquisition of discrete facts”[447] without realising that’s exactly what supports the view he is opposing. Permstrump’s reply put him in his place again (while correcting Levental’s spelling change)[448] but the resulting partial backflip by Levental still insisted on special interests not working in the way implied.[449] He then reworded the caption on the main page[450] only for three editors to remove his narrow line.[451] That clearly chased Levental off for a few months.
4. 2016 (October – December)
In late October Levental returned and created a new article on Matthew Belmonte – on the basis of Belmonte’s claim that neurodiversity was a “dangerous distraction”.[452] Belmonte is pro cure,[453] presented as another attempt by Levental to promote autism as bad. When a notability tag was added[454] Levental resorted to using an IP from his local community college in Lansing[455] to add material to try and counter it.[456] Levental then returned to the issue of Hans Asperger calling his subjects “little professors” and removed the claim stating in the edit summary there was no evidence.[457] That was reverted by an established user who referenced Hans Asperger’s original description.[458] This caused Levental to bail to the talk page to make his case including trying to claim someone else gave the label using the unreliable “In a Different Key” as a source.[459] He only waited for a little over half a day before deciding to “be bold” and remove the claim from the main article again.[460] Another established user reverted it again wanting a consensus on it and rightly.[461] Meanwhile a previous established user was on the talk page and rightly shot down Levental’s commentary[462] and the user who reverted Levental gave notice of doing it stating it was sourced.[463] Levental response was self serving, trying to discount Asperger’s contribution to large degree as well as claiming sourcing against the claim again,[464] and then adding an opinion that was totally wrong.[465] An already involved user in reply pointed out in effect that professional sources were better than popular press sources (slamming In a Different Key in effect)[466] and Levental decided he wanted to replace the professional source with a popular press one![467] That was a continuation of his refusal to get the medical source rules. Without a reply Levental decided to press the opinion expressed on the talk page by adding a word to the main article.[468] He repeated the change on the History of Asperger Syndrome article,[469] and added another similar edit to wording.[470] He also put a restriction in similar terms of the Hans Asperger article.[471]
The edit on the History of Asperger syndrome was reverted by an IP as an opinion[472] but Levental used the aforementioned local community college in Lansing[455] to put it back again.[473] Another IP noticed this along with the Matthew Belmonte edits and made a sockpuppet report where Levental admitted to socking but tried to excuse it as not improper editing based purely on content.[474] An admin of SPI’s made it clear this was incorrect and added a warning to Levental’s talk page.[475] Levental’s IP edit on the History of Asperger syndrome was reverted by an established user.[476]
At the beginning of December, Levental created two more articles in the same vein – David Miedzianik[477] and Jill Escher (whose article was deleted at the time).[478] Miedzianik is a negatively affected autistic also much like Jonathan Mitchell,[479] while Escher denies the genetic basis of the spectrum in favour of drug induced causation.[480] She has also collaborated with Autism Speaks[481] making her an enemy of the Autistic community in her own right.
After adding both of them to the Autism rights movement template,[482][483] Levental returned to the “little professors” argument on the History of Asperger syndrome article and removed the claim and it’s source stating in the edit summary that the term wasn’t there.[484] This was reverted by an IP telling him not to remove sourced information[485] but Levental removed it again querying if the claim was sourced properly.[486] The IP reverted it again and told him in the edit summary that if he had an issue with the source, take it to the Reliable sources noticeboard (RSN).[487] After adding an attack on Steve Silberman by Autism Speaks to the Autism Speaks page[488] in a biased act that would have a follow up in 2017, Levental went to the RSN and started a thread accordingly with amendments.[489][490][491][492] An established user provided the quote but unfortunately added that Asperger was talking about a single patient,[493] causing Levental to use it as an excuse to remove it again from the main page.[494] Another IP put it back yet again making the point that the quote was there no matter what[495] and repeated it on the RSN.[496] But then another established user attributed the quote to the author and not Asperger[497] and Levental pounced again and removed it on the main page.[498] He was obviously determined to get rid of the reference in this negativity binge. Another IP put it back yet again claiming no proof he didn’t say it[499] which didn’t really help as one can’t prove a negative. But the same IP had already put a comment on the RSN claiming a possible translation error and suggested a search of the German translation, as well as making the valid point abut Levental’s bias and pointing to the existence of other sources.[500] That upset Levental who responded by claiming one could say anything and keep it until it had been proven wrong (which was actually right) but in the same edit claimed he had a copy anyway and “couldn’t find it”[501] which was equally as suspicious as the IP’s incorrect claim. Not waiting for a reply, Levental removed all the other sources to the claim from the main page claiming they were all questionable[502] and then removed the claim itself and the original source yet again.[503] The IP restored the lot telling Levental he couldn’t remove them for that reason.[504] On the RSN meanwhile another established user supported the first source removal that the thread was about[505] and the IP added that this didn’t apply to the other sources Levental removed.[506]
Levental continued his bias calling most of the sources unreliable and removed them again[507] and the IP put them back calling it Levental’s opinion only.[508] Unfortunately other users on the RSN decided to believe Levental, but luckily a reliable source was found and the IP added it putting an end to the matter.[509] On that article anyway…..
5. 2017
After a month away, Levental returned and clearly he wasn’t letting the “Little Professors” issue go – and went to the talk page of Asperger syndrome querying one of the sources.[510] He was told that the source went offline in 2006 and he had to look for it at his local library.[511] Meanwhile on the main article, Levental again tried to play down the image by changing it again, this time to someone examining a sportsbook.[512] This was an attempt to water down the high intelligence level of some on the Spectrum – or in other words more bias. That was identified in the reverting edit by an established user.[513] Back on the talk page Levental advised that he’d found the article at his library[514] and then added a lazy disclaimer before quoting what he’d found.[515] He used that to make a minor change to the Asperger syndrome article[516] but it was reverted as not making sense.[517] Levental put it back pointing to the talk page[518] but another established user removed it and another word as well[519] causing Levental to re-add it again with the same excuse[520] and also adding a note that smacked of bullying on the other user’s talk page.[521] Said user didn’t reply there. Levental then added an attempt at a clarification[522] but then he went to the talk page and suspiciously struck out his note from the wrong source.[523] He didn’t need to do that. The bullied user responded here meanwhile stating the word “often” wasn’t needed either way[524] and Levental gave a two faced reply – on the one side agreeing but on the other side pressing his point anyway.[525] This was a clear example of gaming the system against Wikipedia rules.[526] He added a link to the file to back it up[527] and that seemed to be that. The edit remains today.
After an inoffensive edit adding a picture to the Manuel Casanova article we jumped to March and the aforementioned Steve Silberman issue. Levental went to his article and added an entire section criticising him,[528][529] and followed up with a mess of edits unchallenged for at least 18 hours.[530] He also added Silberman to the Autism Rights Movement template[531] and then added a section called “Criticism”[532] in another show of a bias intending at that point to add critics to the template. Levental then went ahead and created the article on Silberman’s book Neurotribes[533] and making a series of edits after that.[534] It was clear that the whole thing was about criticising the book in that form, in yet another show of bias. He also added Neurotribes to the Autism Resources template in that form.[535]
Someone finally noticed Levental’s nonsense on the Silberman article, but instead of removing it the user added material to support Silberman over several edits.[536] It included a citation demand for the criticism overall. Levental childishly struck back with a return citation demand for the praise,[537] and then added a quote with a source but at the same time adding his own opinion about an implication.[538] Finally an established user removed the criticism section rightly noting in the edit summary “This entire section is undue weight, poorly/unreliable sources, filled with weasel words, etc. discuss on talk page.”[539] Levental promptly put it back except for the opinion and called that “trimmed back”[540] only for the same user to remove it again and repeat the weight issue and the talk page demand.[541] The user had already started a section on the talk page[542] and Levental played a massive suck up in reply but was clearly keen to re-add it somehow.[543] The Neurotribes article meanwhile was also noticed and virtually all of the article was removed with an accurate edit summary[544] and Levental reacted by copying and pasting the whole section on the Silberman article on it.[545]
Realising he couldn’t do what he wanted with either article at that point, Levental decided to create an article on the book that was the antithesis to Neurotribes; In a +Different Key.[546] He then made a bunch of edits to it, clearly creating an article that supported the book but only one short remark of criticism from Ari Ne’eman.[547] He also edited the page on one of the authors, John Donvan, but his edits and the edits of many others were removed and totally deleted for copyright violations.[548] Levental also added In a Different Key to the Autism resources template,[549] and Donvan to the Autism rights movement template[550] although he later removed it.[551]
Back on Neurotribes, Levental restored the criticism section but provided no responses and added an awards section thinking that was the counter balance required.[552] It wasn’t as an established user put a point of view template on it and changed the title from Criticisms to Reactions.[553] On the talk page for the Silberman article, Levental proposed the very same edit he put on Neurotribes except without the Ari Ne’eman comment and trying to justify it with no blogs as sources.[554] The same established user pointed out the same edit issue in reply as well as the fact that criticism of specific books do not belong in biographies.[555] That seemed to end that.
Levental then added more biased material to the David Miedzianik article with a source, about how Autistics thinking for themselves are like computers, and how his own country won’t accept him[556] – implying that this was in fact correct when it’s not. Levental also added an archived version of what he claimed was Miedzianik’s website.[557] He then created an article on Leo Kanner’s very first formal Autism diagnosis, Donald Triplett, although his first bunch of edits were totally deleted for copyright violations.[558] He did add positive notes about Triplett’s abilities,[559] but he copied it exactly in contradiction to copyright rules and it was removed by an established user.[560] Levental also added Triplett to the Autism article[561] but repeated the same mistake and it was also removed by the same established user.[562] So he tried again on the Triplett article[563] and this time it stuck. He did the same with the Autism article[564] before adding notes about the DSM-III and the DSM-5 with a source.[565] He then added other materials from other articles on Wikipedia[566][567][568] only for an established user to revert the lot referencing non working references and other issues.[569] Levental put back the first two edits noting the removals,[570] and the established user clearly saw some bias and reworded some of it accordingly.[571] After some editing in the mathematics area of Wikipedia, Levental disappeared for the rest of the year.
6. 2018
At an unrecorded point in early 2018, Levental created an article on Thomas Clements. It was nominated for deletion, and nominator made it clear that the article was promotional for reasons of the sources.[572] Levental commented on it admitting to the issue[573] and seemingly doing nothing about it leading presumably to it’s deletion.[574] But despite the deletion, he made alterations as though it was still there firstly by adding Clements to the Autism rights movement template,[575] before doing the same to the Tom Clements diambiguation page[576] and moving another Thomas Clements (an Irish clergyman) to “Thomas Clements (dignitary)”.[577] All three were reverted,[578][579][580] and the last two has the user that reverted them warning Levental on his talk page making him back down over that particular action.[581]
But he wouldn’t let the Clements deletion go, and he created an article in his user space as a draft.[582] This was the beginning of a long effort to get the article accepted. He applied for the article to be reviewed and moved it into Wikipedia’s draft space,[583] before asking the user who reverted his disambiguation nonsense for an opinion.[584] The user concerned advised that he had nothing to do with the deletion and told him to contact those involved instead.[585] Levental never did. The draft was declined about a couple of months later,[586] while Levental disappeared again until November (aside from one edit). In the meantime the draft was tagged for speedy deletion for inactivity[587] and deleted.[588]
In November, Levental did more edits to the article on David Miedzianik,[589] probably upon seeing an established user tag it as needing more sources.[590] He also noticed the work done on it by another user and went to his talk page to ask how he knew as much as he did about him.[591] The user concerned didn’t reply. Late in December, Levental added Miedzianik’s book “My Autobiography” as a notable work[592] when it didn’t have an article and therefore couldn’t be stated in that vein, certainly at that point.
But also in late December he was at it again with Thomas Clements. Without even a draft in place, Levental added him back to the Autism rights movement template,[593] added him again to the Tom Clements disambiguation page,[594] did the page move of the Irish pastor to dignitary again[595] and made that change to the Clements disambiguation page as well.[596]
7. 2019 (January)
All of the edits from late December re Thomas Clements were reverted by the same established user.[597][598][599] Said user also curiously deleted Levental’s user page upon user request[600] Levental reacted to the first act by recreating the draft on Clements[601] and then working on it before submitting it for review.[602] The second situation attracted a question on Levental’s talk page from another user[603] and Levental made an allegation in reply that carried no weight by his own admission.[604] The user TLPG shows a redlink for contributions which means the account was not for Wikipedia but for another Wikimedia site.[605] A global account search reveals activity on four other sites – Wiki Commons, Wikiquote, Mediawiki and Wikidata.[606] But no Wikipedia.
The Clements draft was declined pretty swiftly,[607] and Levental made more edits adding only one more source before submitting it again for review.[608] But then curiously it was revoked by another user alleging an IRC request.[609]
Levental went back to the David Miedzianik article and took off the edge to a comment in another biased edit[610] although his single edits to Jonathan Mitchell and Matthew Belmonte were not controversial. Neither was adding Mitchell to the already existing page for his sister Melanie. But he was at it again back on the Miedzianik article in a bunch of edits that included an excuse about employment[611] when in fact he should be fighting for employment.
It was at this point that Levental started working on an article about Grunya Sukhareva, a Russian child psychiatrist who in fact wrote about what we now call Autism as far back as 1926.[612] His first edit simply added a source[613] and after adding a rather personal note on the Thomas McKean article[614] he made a large number of edits over three days[615] which were mostly good. But there was one that was highly prejudicial with a source that smacked of supposition continuing the unproven Nazi connection of Hans Asperger.[616] This edit remains today. Levental also added Sukhareva to the Autism article.[617]
During those edits, he inoffensively added birth names to the McKean and Mitchell article, but he also removed a source template from the Miedzianik article.[618] He then added an unsourced claim to the McKean article[619] before adding a source elsewhere,[620] and then added the same source to the previous claim.[621] Back on the Miedzianik article he added another remark with a source which promoted Miedzianik as having a negative self image, blaming his parents and nothing to indicate any attempt to fix it.[622] He then returned to the McKean article and removed a duplicate source which was okay.
Meanwhile, an IP removed a part of the Mitchell article because the source was an article written by Mitchell and was therefore self published.[623] Levental reverted it claiming it as a primary source,[624] and he then added another example against self publication.[625] He then reverted it[626] in order to put it back again with an edit summary again promoting it as a primary source.[627] This is a blatant example of promoting Mitchell and his views. Levental then returned to the Donald Triplett article which hadn’t changed that much since his last visit in late 2017, and simply added an Authority Control template.
On January 18 after adding Edward Neumeier’s child Shain to his page[628] (Shain is Autistic and an activist[629]) Levental created another example of his promotion bias – the National Council on Severe Autism.[630] He developed it containing promotional language like “a non-profit organization that pursues recognition, policy and solutions for the surging population of individuals, families and caregivers affected by severe forms of autism”, “promote the needs of those affected by autism, who, by virtue of any combination of cognitive and functional impairments, require continuous or near-continuous, lifelong services, supports, and supervision” and “Individuals in this category are often nonverbal or have limited use of language, have intellectual impairment, and, in a subset, exhibit challenging behaviors, such as aggression, self-injury, and/or property destruction that interfere with safety and well-being”.[631] This bias in Autism is exactly what Levental is about. The initial work took place throughout the rest of January.
As a part of that promotion, Levental made an alteration to the article on the Autism Science Foundation noting Alison Singer’s involvement directly instead of indirectly through the ASF,[632] and then used a Twitter tweet (not a reliable source) to re-add the ASF involvement.[633] Then he may have realised his mistake and removed it.[634] He also added the NCSA to the Autism rights movement template.[635]
Back on the Donald Triplett article he made a couple of minor edits before copying a large amount from the Spanish article by his own admission,[636] even adding the template to the talk page.[637]
A couple of days later Levental decided to get a picture of David Miedzianik deleted and edited the page accordingly[638] as well as notifying the uploading user.[639] A follow up on the notification[640] begged the question of where he got the image – insinuating a possible conflict of interest. As if to back that up, Levental went back to the Mitchell article and added a note about Miedzianik.[641]
A few days later, purely in order to game the system, Levental adding criticism of Mitchell’s article in the Spectator to the Mitchell article.[642] Then he continued the promotional effort of the National Council on Severe Autism by adding it to the Neurodiversity article,[643] following that with more promotion in the same article – this time of Thomas Clements.[644] Both edits contained primary sources that were not neutral (one of the sources for the NCSA was written by council member Amy Lutz and the sole source of the second edit was written by Clements himself). This was noticed by an IP and two other users who removed both on a number of occasions[645] (this edit sourced gives the best edit summary). Levental reverted it[646] before inexplicably seeking page protection when most of the reversions were by users and not IP’s.[647] Mind you it was for pending changes which would be ineffective. It was declined for the right reason.[648]
Back on the Mitchell article another user had expanded material and Levental reverted it claiming it was uncited.[649] The user put it back with a valid edit summary,[650] but another user reverted that calling it a reverse BLP issue.[651] The first user disagreed and put it back again[652] and Levental then reverted it called for the issue to go to the talk page.[653] It should be noted that just a couple of minutes before this Levental tried to archive said talk page.[654] This wasn’t noticed straight away. But before all this, the user doing the reverting was on Levental’s own talk page calling him out for his bias and conflict of interest. Levental naively asked who the user was talking to,[655] (or he was playing dumb). It should be noted at the same link was an ANI notification,[656] where rightful comments were made. However nothing happened as a result. The user from the Mitchell page also added a note to the Autism rights movement page and Levental removed that with a ridiculous excuse in the edit summary.[657] Again he got away with it. He also added a supportive promotional note to the National Council on Severe Autism page.[658]
8. 2019 (February)
In his busiest month to date, Levental added a slightly biased note to the Simon Baron-Cohen page using the word “claimed” in what was otherwise a fair comment by Baron-Cohen,[659] before going over to the article on the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) firstly adding a tweet from Samantha Crane,[660] before predictably adding a criticism from Jonathan Mitchell.[661] He also added another criticism from the US General Accounting Office (GAO)[662] which could also be seen as biased although it would have been more of a context issue than anything. The Mitchell part was removed by an IP[663] rightly pointing to self publication, but Levental put it back relying on the platform and adding that Mitchell was independent of the IACC.[664] This was after he went to the Wikipedia Help Desk to check, alleging he knew who the IP was out of sheer paranoia just to justify his actions.[665] He was told in reply it was a content dispute and to take it to the article’s talk page.[666] After the put back he did go to the talk page and stated his case,[667] but he was gaming the system again, and the Mitchell comment remains today. The IP never returned.
Levental then went back to the Mitchell article and reverted a bot’s removal of a picture that had been deleted on WikiCommons, claiming an email to be received.[668] That was not appropriate and further bias. He did the same thing on the David Miedzianik article.[669] He then returned to the National Council on Severe Autism article reverting an IP edit that was rightful but the NCSA is not well known.[670] He then reverted another edit that was in some respects useful (deleting blank space) but in other respects wrong. The edit summary threat was an over reaction to a single edit.[671] Levental may have assumed the IP and the user were one in the same without proof. Next he gamed the system again, with promotional material about one it’s key formation points (guardianship) as well as newsletter numbers and an unsourced comment of support – while adding for balance some criticism although using the soft terms of “claim” and “believe”.[672] He then added their Facebook page,[673] before trimming back the criticism going against the balance issue.[674]
Meanwhile, back on the Neurodiversity article the late January nonsense did have an effect with a section about the disruption.[675] The upshot of the original comments was that a user came in to explain the “meaty operation” (that is – meat puppetry and not sock puppetry) came from Twitter and an anti-neurodiversity hash tag. Presumably #AutisticDarkWeb which Levental supports. At this time Levental denied by imputation that he was involved stating “I was the only one that was editing though”. Much later in April for the record it is also seen that the original accusing user made it clear it was Levental he was talking about, an accusation Levental didn’t deny simply making an observation about conflict of interest instead. This would suggest a lot of meat puppetry at Levental’s hand. Also, Levental added a comment on the talk page in another section stating that Amanda Baggs was low functioning.[676] This is false. Amanda was not low functioning Autistic. Her functioning levels had nothing to do with Autism.
A few days later Shannon Des Roches Rosa, who Levental quoted in the criticism section of the National Council on Severe Autism article, put a correcting note of the talk page of the article.[677] Levental saw that and made a change on the main article,[678] before responding on the talk page accepting the correction but having a go at the TPGA website in terms of reliability by imputation.[678] Levental then made some changes to the Thomas McKean article.[679] Back on the National Council on Severe Autism article, an IP removed the “well known” claim albeit for the wrong reason in the edit summary and Levental reverted it pointing that wrong reasoning out.[680] But he then added another promotional note from a suspect source (The Greater Good).[681] He then added criticism from the Maine Autism collective but at the same time strengthened Amy Lutz’z claim calling it a statement – a harder term than claim.[682]
Levental then got involved in the controversy surrounding the play All in a Row. At that time it was concentrated on the venue of the play, the Southwark Playhouse. Clearly not liking the negativity of the presentation (the negativity was justified), Levental sought to counter it with a series of edits incorporating the addition of non negative reviews.[683] He then went to the article on the lead actress in the play, Charlie Brooks, and removed more negativity from a mainstream source replacing it with a fringe source giving the message more positively along with two sources he used in the Playhouse article.[684] He did the same thing to the article on the writer, Alex Oates.[685]
Then something very suspicious happened. A little over an hour after the Oates edit, an IP prodded the Julia Bascom article for deletion.[686] Then presumbly noticing that it had been nominated for deletion previously, the IP then changed it to an AfD,[687] and quickly adding a note on the talk page on the reasons[688] and a request on the AfD talk page to complete the process.[689] This is suspicious because the IP resolves to Highland Park in Michigan,[690] only 84.8 miles (136 kilometres) from East Lansing put at 1 hour and 18 minutes[691] away traffic permitting. It is possible that the Highland Park note might not be exact, but it is in the Detroit metropolitan area and it could have been closer to the edge of the metropolitan area than that. So it can be speculated that these edits were Levental socking after a car trip from home. To back that up, later Levental created the AfD[692] as well as the other required parts including replying on the AfD talk page. He also replied on the Julia Bascom talk page[693] and note in the IP’s comment there the two spaces after the full stop – a common editing error by Levental. The AfD failed after extra sources were added.
An IP meanwhile had reverted Levental’s edit on the Alex Oates page, and Levental put it back claiming “counterbalance”[694] (an admission of bias in effect), before going back to the McKean article to do more work changing the order of some passages as well as added a couple of publications.[695] He then added more material to the Jonathan Mitchell article without clearance, although the first was simply adding a wikilink which would have been okay.[696] The second however was promotional again, expanding on the Spectator article/opinion with a Spectator podcast.[697] Levental then realised that the Julia Bascom article wasn’t going to be deleted and removed the notability tag[698] before reverting that for some reason only to simply add the Autism Rights Movement template.[699]
Back on the National Council on Severe Autism article, Levental changed the business status source and removed it’s business status identification.[700] This was in response to a comment on the article’s talk page to which Levental then replied.[701] But then he added a needless quip about his relationship with the NCSA,[702] which can be said in consequent times to be a lie. He then returned to the Southwark Playhouse article and changed the order and added some more material in the meantime.[703] He also added a piece to the Alex Oates article marking it incorrectly as a minor edit.[704] But back on the talk page of the National Council on Severe Autism another user queried the lack of registration with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and Levental claimed they didn’t have to and gave reasons why.[705] The response wasn’t entirely accurate because registration is required by any company who deals in the stock market.[706]
(Continue from February 15)
(Note the two week block for socking and reminder in June or July)
8. 2020
(Blocked indefinitely on June 20 – block evasion through an IP consequently)
(Socked with two accounts – consequently requested block of IP; see below)
Levental stated in his request that; “I have mental issues that will make it hard to not sock” and “and the quarantine makes it hard to go outside much”.[707] These are excuses that show that he is not willing to adjust to being Autistic and let it control him instead.
Change.org
On June 20, 2016, Levental – under the name “Y L” (this was confirmed by his friend Mitchell)[735] – started a petition calling on the Autism Society of America to remove Steve Silberman from their keynote speaker list at their conference on July 16.[736] In the petition text, Levental uses Jonathan Mitchell as a source to try to prove Silberman to be a bad person, when in fact Silberman has told the truth and Levental has not proven otherwise. The petition failed and was closed with just 97 supporters on July 15, 2016.[737] Silberman himself commented when the petition was advertised by another party on the Wrong Planet forum, advising that the petition starter had “berated” him for over a year.[738] Another poster advised that Silberman’s appearance went ahead.[739] However that didn’t stop Levental from trying again to stop Silberman from a keynote address – this time to the Victorian Autism Conference in Australia on September 1, 2016.[740] Phil Gluyas, who resides in Victoria, posted an entry on his blog confirming Silberman’s attendance and countering the claims in the petition as well as asserting that the petition was a violation of Change.org’s policies.[741] As before this petition also failed, attracting only 14 signatures, and Silberman’s appearance went ahead again.[742]
Battered Man Syndrome
Levental has contributed articles to Battered Man,[743] apparently indicating that he has been abused himself given that the site is all about people of this ilk.[744] In one article that was also published on another website he defends Christian Chandler without realising that Chandler’s conduct is unacceptable even for an Autistic.[745] However “Brian” – without proof – contradicted the indication claiming Levental was “a white supremacist and a violent misogynist.”[746] Levental’s edits to Black Pride and White Pride on Wikipedia (see above) however appear to support the possibility of the first allegation. In mid May 2015, Levental volunteered to go on a hunger strike “to raise awareness about the reality of Autism and masculinity” as well as promote a book by “an unemployed autistic author” (presumably Jonathan Mitchell’s “Mu Rhythm Bluff”). He claimed to want to do it for a minimum of 2 to 3 days to get around 300 people to buy the book through Kindle.[747] There is no evidence that the strike went ahead. Levental’s membership of an anti misandry site (now defunct[748]) is also suspicious on the back of the unproven claim by “Brian”.
Plastic Surgery
Levental noted an article about a study claiming the facial features of autistics being different to that of neurotypical people.[749] He used this to try plastic surgery as a treatment and claims that botox relieved pressure above his nose and improved his autistic symptoms.[750] This claim has not been verified, especially as facial features are also crucial in the identification of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.[751] Levental apparently had breathing difficulties through the nose which was likely totally unrelated to his Autism and at worst was causing a sensory overload[752] that the botox resolved. On his You Tube channel, Levental made an unrecorded claim that the surgery in fact cured his autism and he also claimed that he was the first to be cured. There is no proof that he has been cured, nor was he the first to make the claim given the number of supporters of The Vaccine Myth who have also claimed to have cured their children of Autism. In fact as of late 2018 he was still trying to treat his Autism through a gluten free diet.[753]
The Pursuit of Knowledge
In 2019, Levental had a book published. Sub titled “My Unconventional Articles on Autism and Neurodiversity”
(Need to see free of charge if possible)
References
[1] Levental on Facebook
[2] Levental on LinkedIn
[3] 10th Annual Nurturing Developing Minds Conference Page 47
[4] Questioning Neurodiversity: Show me the proof
[5] Autism Daily Newcast: Those on the Spectrum Might be the Most Misrepresented Group in Today’s Society (archived)
[6] Levental on Twitter
[7] Newsweek: The Debate over an Autism Cure Turns Hostile (comment has been hidden)
[8] Microsoft announces pilot program to hire people with autism
[9] Microsoft Grossly Exaggerates the Value of its Hiring Program for People with Autism, by Yuval Levental
[10] Autism is Bad: Neurodiversity Amendment
[11] Autism is Bad: Neurodiversity Amendment comments page 2
[12] Wikipedia:Notification of speedy deletion
[13] Wikipedia:2014 Isla Vista killings edit
[14] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy edit
[15] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy edit
[16] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page edit
[17] Reddit: I tricked SJWikipedia into creating an article for “Dixon White”
[18] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page edit
[19] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page edit
[20] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page edit
[21] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page
[22] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page
[23] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page
[24] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page
[25] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page
[26] Wikipedia:Gamergate controversy talk page
[27] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell first edit
[28] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell reversion by Roscelese
[29] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell challenge by IP
[30] Wikipedia:Neurodiversity edit by Ylevental
[31] Wikipedia:Autism Rights Movement edit by Ylevental
[32] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[33] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[34] Wikipedia:Autism reversion by Jytdog
[35] Wikipedia:Autism reversion by Ylevental
[36] Wikipedia:Autism reversion by Yobol
[37] Wikipedia:Autism talk archive #16
[38] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnosis edit by Ylevental
[39] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnosis edit by Ylevental
[40] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnosis edit by Ylevental
[41] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnosis edit by Ylevental
[42] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnosis edit by Ylevental
[43] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnosis edit by Winkelvi
[44] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnosis edit by Ylevental
[45] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[46] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[47] Wikipedia:Late Talker edit by Ylevental
[48] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page – Conflict of Interest
[49] Wikipedia:Temple Grandin edit by Ylevental
[50] Wikipedia:Temple Grandin edit by DaveSeidel
[51] Wikipedia:Temple Grandin edit by Ylevental
[52] Wikipedia:Temple Grandin edit by Winkelvi
[53] Wikipedia:Temple Grandin edit by Ylevental
[54] Wikipedia:Temple Grandin edit by Winkelvi
[55] Jonathan Mitchell Featured article nomination #1
[56] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[57] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[58] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[59] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[60] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Ylevental
[61] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Ylevental
[62] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Espresso Addict
[63] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Ylevental
[64] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by SummerPhDv2.0
[65] Wikipedia:Amanda Baggs edit by Ylevental
[66] Wikipedia:Amanda Baggs edit by Ylevental
[67] Wikipedia:Amanda Baggs edit by Winkelvi
[68] Wikipedia:Autism Network International edit by Ylevental
[69] Wikipedia:Autism Network International edit by T Cells
[70] Wikipedia:Amy Sequenzia edit by Ylevental
[71] Wikipedia:Amy Sequenzia edit by Espresso Addict
[72] Wikipedia:Jim Sinclair edit by Ylevental
[73] Wikipedia:Jim Sinclair edit by CactusWriter
[74] Wikipedia:Autism National Committee edit by Ylevental
[75] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[76] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[77] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[78] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[79] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[80] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Winkelvi
[81] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[82] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[83] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Winkelvi
[84] Wikipedia:Talk page of Winkelvi edit by Ylevental
[85] Wikipedia:Talk page of Winkelvi edit by Winkelvi
[86] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[87] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[88] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors edit by Ylevental
[89] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors page move by Ylevental
[90] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors page move by Bilorv
[91] Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Asperger’s editors talk page; December 2015 recent edits
[92] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[93] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[94] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[95] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[96] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[97] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[98] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[99] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[100] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[101] Wikipedia:WP Teahouse edit by Ylevental
[102] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[103] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[104] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[105] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by KrazyKlimber
[106] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by KrazyKlimber
[107] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page edit
[108] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by KrazyKlimber
[109] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[110] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[111] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by Ylevental
[112] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by KrazyKlimber
[113] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edits
[114] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by Ylevental
[115] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[116] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[117] Wikipedia:Own talk page edit by Ylevental
[118] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edits by Ylevental
[119] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edits by Ylevental
[120] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edits by Ylevental
[121] Wikipedia:Peer review of Jonathan Mitchell
[122] Wikipedia:HJ Mitchell talk page edit by Ylevental
[123] Wikipedia:Lihaas talk page edit by Ylevental
[124] Wikipedia:Philg88 talk page edit by Ylevental
[125] Wikipedia:HJ Mitchell talk page edit by HJ Mitchell
[126] Wikipedia:Philg88 talk page edit by Philg88
[127] Wikipedia:ANI edit by Ylevental
[128] Wikipedia:ANI edit by Ylevental
[129] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell AfD edit by Ylevental
[130] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell AfD
[131] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[132] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edits by Ylevental
[133] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Jytdog
[134] Jonathan Mitchell Featured article nomination #2
[135] Wikipedia:Look me in the eye edit by Ylevental
[136] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Ylevental
[137] Wikipedia:Look me in the eye edit by IP
[138] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by IP
[139] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Ylevental
[140] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by IP
[141] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Ylevental
[142] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[143] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by CatPath
[144] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[145] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[146] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[147] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[148] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[149] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[150] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[151] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[152] Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigation of Ylevental 12 January 2016
[153] Whois Gateway: wfmlabs.org
[154] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[155] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Doug Weller
[156] Whois Gateway: wfmlabs.org
[157] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[158] Wikipedia:Aspies for Freedom edits by Ylevental
[159] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[160] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[161] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[162] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[163] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[164] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[165] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[166] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[167] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[168] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[169] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[170] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[171] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[172] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Jytdog
[173] Wikipedia:ANI report
[174] Jonathan Mitchell Featured article nomination #3
[175] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[176] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[177] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[178] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black pride
[179] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black pride edit by Vexations
[180] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[181] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[182] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[183] Wikipedia talk:White pride edit by Ylevental
[184] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ratemonth
[185] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[186] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ratemonth
[187] Wikipedia talk:Black Pride:Revert Please
[188] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[189] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ratemonth
[190] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ratemonth
[191] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ratemonth
[192] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[193] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ratemonth
[194] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[195] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[196] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[197] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[198] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by EvergreenFir
[199] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[200] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Ylevental
[201] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Ylevental
[202] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edits by Tom29739
[203] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Ylevental
[204] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Ylevental
[205] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Tom29739
[206] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Tom29739
[207] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Tom29739
[208] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Tom29739
[209] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Tom29739
[210] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Ylevental
[211] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[212] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Ylevental
[213] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by IP
[214] Wikipedia:Einstein Syndrome edit by Ylevental
[215] Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion edit by Ylevental
[216] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[217] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by EvergreenFir
[218] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[219] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by EvergreenFir
[220] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[221] Wikipedia:Black Pride edit by Ylevental
[222] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page edit by EvergreenFir
[223] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[224] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[225] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by EvergreenFir
[226] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[227] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[228] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[229] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[230] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[231] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[232] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by EvergreenFir
[233] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[234] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[235] Wikipedia:White Pride talk page edit by Ylevental
[236] Wikipedia:White Pride talk page edit by SummerPhDv2.0
[237] Wikipedia:White Pride talk page edit by Ylevental
[238] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[239] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[240] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by SummerPhDv2.0
[241] Wikipedia:White Pride edit by Ylevental
[242] Wikipedia:White Privilege edit by Ylevental
[243] Wikipedia:White Privilege edit by Ylevental
[244] Wikipedia:White Privilege edit by Ylevental
[245] Wikipedia:White Privilege edit by Ylevental
[246] Wikipedia:White Privilege edit by Malik Shabazz
[247] Wikipedia:Peggy McIntosh edit by Ylevental
[248] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[249] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[250] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[251] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Clpo13
[252] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by DoggySoup
[253] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[254] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[255] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[256] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[257] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[258] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[259] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[260] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[261] Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Retrospective diagnoses of autism
[262] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Sinclair (activist)
[263] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autism Network International
[264] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autistic Self Advocacy Network
[265] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Sequenzia
[266] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspies for Freedom (5th nomination)
[267] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrong Planet (3rd nomination)
[268] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Elder Robison
[269] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autistic Pride Day
[270] Wikipedia:John Elder Robison edit by Ylevental
[271] Wikipedia:Jim Sinclair (activist) edit by Ylevental
[272] Wikipedia:Ari Ne’eman edit by Ylevental
[273] Wikipedia:Temple Grandin edit by Ylevental
[274] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by Ylevental
[275] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by IP
[276] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by Ylevental
[277] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by IP
[278] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by Ylevental
[279] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell talk page edit by Ylevental
[280] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[281] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[282] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[283] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[284] Wikipedia:Jim Sinclair (activist) edit by Ylevental
[285] Wikipedia:Aspies for Freedom edit by Ylevental
[286] Wikipedia:Aspies for Freedom edit by Ylevental
[287] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[288] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[289] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[290] Wikipedia:Administrator’s Noticeboard – Ylevental – COI and related issues
[291] Wikipedia:Deletion Review – Einstein syndrome
[292] Wikipedia:Deletion Review – Einstein syndrome reply
[293] Wikipedia:Late talker edit by Ylevental
[294] Wikipedia:Late talker edit by Ylevental
[295] Wikipedia:Deletion Review – Einstein syndrome update
[296] Wikipedia:Late talker
[297] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[298] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by IP
[299] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[300] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by HalfShadow
[301] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page edit by HalfShadow
[302] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page edit by Ylevental
[303] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[304] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[305] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by IP
[306] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[307] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by IP
[308] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by Ylevental
[309] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet action by GedUK
[310] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[311] Wikipedia:Coatrack articles
[312] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by CatPath
[313] Wikipedia:Talk page of Retrospective diagnoses of autism – Wondering if the List of individuals and Specific individuals sections violate WP:COATRACK
[314] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[315] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[316] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[317] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[318] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[319] Wikipedia:Talk page of Retrospective diagnoses of autism – Are Fitzgerald-only people valid?
[320] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[321] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[322] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[324] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[325] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[326] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[327] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[328] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[329] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[330] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Megalibrarygirl
[331] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by Ylevental
[332] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism edit by IP
[333] Wikipedia:Retrospective diagnoses of autism action by Ymblanter
[334] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by IP
[335] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by IP
[336] What is my IP Address geolocation
[337] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by IP
[338] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by IP
[339] Wikipedia:Wrong Planet edit by SummerPhD2.0
[340] Wikipedia:Creation of Thomas A McKean article
[341] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by NottNott
[342] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by Ylevental
[343] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by Ylevental
[344] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by Ylevental
[345] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by Ylevental
[346] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by Ylevental
[347] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean talk page – Contested deletion
[348] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by Graeme Bartlett
[349] Wikipedia:Creation of Switched On article
[350] Wikipedia:Switched On edit by CorenSearchBot
[350] Wikipedia:Switched On edit by Ylevental
[352] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[353] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by DaveSeidel
[354] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[355] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Andy Dingley
[356] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[357] Wikipedia:User Andy Dingley talk page edit by Ylevental
[358] Wikipedia:User Jytdog talk page edit by Ylevental
[359] Wikipedia:Hans Asperger edit by Ylevental
[360] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[361] Wikipedia:Professor edit by Ylevental
[362] Wikipedia:Hans Asperger edits by Ylevental
[363] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edits by Ylevental
[364] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[365] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[366] Wikipedia:Societal and cultural aspects of autism edit by Ylevental
[367] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[368] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Jytdog
[369] Wikipedia template:Pervasive developmental disorders edit by Ylevental
[370] Wikipedia template:Autism resources edit by Ylevental
[371] Wikipedia template:Autism resources edit by SummerPhDv2.0
[372] Wikipedia template talk:Autism resources edit by SummerPhDv2.0
[373] Wikipedia template talk:Autism resources edit by Ylevental
[374] Wikipedia template talk:Autism resources edit by Ylevental
[375] Wikipedia template talk:Autism resources edit by SummerPhDv2.0
[376] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by Ylevental
[377] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by Ylevental
[378] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell edit by IP
[379] Wikipedia:Thomas A McKean edit by IP
[380] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[381] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Patient Zero
[382] Wikipedia:Stephen Shore creation by Ylevental
[383] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[384] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[385] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Doc James
[386] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[387] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Andy Dingley
[388] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[389] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Jytdog
[390] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[391] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Jytdog
[392] Wikipedia:Ari Ne’eman edit by Ylevental
[393] Wikipedia:Ari Ne’eman edit by Ylevental
[394] Wikipedia:Ari Ne’eman edit by IP
[395] Wikipedia:Autistic Self Advocacy Network edit by Ylevental
[396] Wikipedia:Autistic Self Advocacy Network edit by IP
[397] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome in popular culture edit by Ylevental
[398] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome in popular culture edit by Ylevental
[399] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome in popular culture edit by Ylevental
[400] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome in popular culture edit by Ylevental
[401] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome in popular culture edit by Ylevental
[402] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome in popular culture edit by Ylevental
[403] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome in popular culture edit by Ylevental
[404] Wikipedia:Talk page of Autism spectrum disorders in the media – Proposed merger with Asperger syndrome in popular culture
[405] Wikipedia:Autism spectrum disorders in the media edit by Ylevental
[406] Wikipedia:Autism spectrum disorders in the media edit by Ylevental
[407] Wikipedia:Autism spectrum disorders in the media edit by Ylevental
[408] Wikipedia:Autism spectrum disorders in the media edits by Ylevental
[409] Wikipedia:Autism resources Template edit by Ylevental
[410] Wikipedia:Autism resources Template edit by SummerPhDv2.0
[411] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page edit
[412] Wikipedia:Ted Cruz 2016 presidential campaign edit by Ylevental
[413] Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard #Ylevental the Vandal
[414] Wikipedia User:Ylevental (archived)
[415] Wikipedia:Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative edit by Ylevental
[416] Wikipedia:Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative edit by Ylevental
[417] Wikipedia:Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative edit by Ylevental
[418] Wikipedia:Autism resources Template edit by Ylevental
[419] Wikipedia:Autism Speaks edit by Ylevental
[420] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[421] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[422] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[423] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[424] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Doc James
[425] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[426] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[427] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by SandyGeorgia
[428] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[429] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[430] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by PatientZero
[431] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Doc James
[432] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[433] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by PatientZero
[434] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page – Moving forward
[435] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page – RfC: Proposal to change lead image to photo of Hans Asperger
[436] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page – Discussion
[437] Wikipedia:Deletion discussion – Hans Asperger image
[438] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page – RfC: Proposal to remove lead image altogether from the article
[439] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[440] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[441] Autism in DSM-5: progress and challenges
[442] Med Page Today: Autism Criteria Critics Blasted by DSM-5 Leader
[443] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Permstrump
[444] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[445] Definition of “Specialize”(Specialise)
[446] Definition of “Restricted”
[447] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[448] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Permstrump
[449] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[450] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[451] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edits by Andy Dingley, SandyGeorgia and DocJames
[452] Wikipedia:Creation of Matthew Belmonte article
[453] Republic of Outsiders (Alissa Quart)
[454] Wikipedia:Matthew Belmonte edit by IP
[455] Identity of IP address
[456] Wikipedia:Matthew Belmonte edits by IP
[457] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[458] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Andy Dingley
[459] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[460] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[461] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Dbrodbeck
[462] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Andy Dingley
[463] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Dbrodbeck
[464] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[465] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[466] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Doc James
[467] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[468] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[469] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[470] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[471] Wikipedia:Hans Asperger edit by Ylevental
[472] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[473] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[474] Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations of Ylevental 10 November 2016
[475] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page edit by Bbb23
[476] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Vermont
[477] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik page creation and move by Ylevental
[478] Wikipedia:Deletion log “Jill Escher”
[479] Wikipedia:David_Miedzianik
[480] PMC Journal: Bugs in the program
[481] Bay Area Autism Consortium member profile: Jill Escher
[482] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement Template edit by Ylevental
[483] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement Template edit by Ylevental
[484] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[485] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[486] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[487] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[488] Wikipedia:Autism Speaks edits by Ylevental
[489] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by Ylevental
[490] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by Ylevental
[491] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by Ylevental
[492] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by Ylevental
[493] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by Someguy1221
[494] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[495] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[496] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by IP
[497] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by CatPath
[498] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[499] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[500] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by IP
[501] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by Ylevental
[502] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[503] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[504] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[505] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by Guy Macon
[506] Wikipedia:Reliable sources noticeboard edit by IP
[507] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[508] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[509] Wikipedia:History of Asperger syndrome edit by IP
[510] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[511] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Jytdog
[512] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[513] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Petergstrom
[514] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[515] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[516] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[517] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Petergstrom
[518] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[519] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Doc James
[520] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[521] Wikipedia:User Doc James talk page edit by Ylevental
[522] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome edit by Ylevental
[523] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[524] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Doc James
[525] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[526] Wikipedia:Gaming the system
[527] Wikipedia:Asperger syndrome talk page edit by Ylevental
[528] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edit by Ylevental
[529] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edit by Ylevental
[530] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edits by Ylevental
[531] Wikipedia:Autism Rights Movement Template edit by Ylevental
[532] Wikipedia:Autism Rights Movement Template edit by Ylevental
[533] Wikipedia:Neurotribes creation and edit by Ylevental
[534] Wikipedia:Neurotribes edits by Ylevental
[535] Wikipedia:Autism resources Template edit by Ylevental
[536] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edits by Glasselevators
[537] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edit by Ylevental
[538] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edit by Ylevental
[539] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edit by NorthBySouthBaranof
[540] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edit by Ylevental
[541] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman edit by NorthBySouthBaranof
[542] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman talk page edit by NorthBySouthBaranof
[543] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman talk page edit by Ylevental
[544] Wikipedia:Neurotribes edit by IP
[545] Wikipedia:Neurotribes edit by Ylevental
[546] Wikipedia:In a Different Key creation and edit by Ylevental
[547] Wikipedia:In a Different Key edits by Ylevental
[548] Wikipedia:John Donvan – Revision History
[549] Wikipedia:Autism resources Template edit by Ylevental
[550] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement Template edit by Ylevental
[551] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement Template edit by Ylevental
[552] Wikipedia:Neurotribes edit by Ylevental
[553] Wikipedia:Neurotribes edit by NorthBySouthBaranof
[554] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman talk page edit by Ylevental
[555] Wikipedia:Steve Silberman talk page edit by NorthBySouthBaranof
[556] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[557] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[558] Wikipedia:Donald Triplett edit by Diannaa
[559] Wikipedia:Donald Triplett edit by Ylevental
[560] Wikipedia:Donald Triplett edit by Haploidavey
[561] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[562] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Haploidavey
[563] Wikipedia:Donald Triplett edit by Ylevental
[564] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[565] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[566] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[567] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[568] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[569] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Doc James
[570] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[571] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Doc James
[572] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Clements (Writer)
[573] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Clements (Writer) edit by Ylevental
[574] Wikipedia:Deletion Log for Thomas Clements (Writer)
[575] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement Template edit by Ylevental
[576] Wikipedia:Tom Clements (disambiguation) edit by Ylevental
[577] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements edit by Ylevental
[578] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement Template edit by IP
[579] Wikipedia:Tom Clements (disambiguation) edit by BD2412
[580] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements edit by BD2412
[581] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page – WP:MALPLACED pages
[582] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft creation and edit by Ylevental
[583] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft edit by Ylevental
[584] Wikipedia:BD2412 talk page edit by Ylevental
[585] Wikipedia:BD2412 talk page edit by BD2412
[586] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft edit by KJP1
[587] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft edit by JJMC89
[588] Wikipedia:Deletion Log for Draft:Thomas Clements (Writer)
[589] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edits by Ylevental
[590] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Cordless Larry
[591] Wikipedia:Talk page of Heepman1997 edit by Ylevental
[592] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[593] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement template edit by Ylevental
[594] Wikipedia:Tom Clements disambiguation page edit by Ylevental
[595] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements edit by Ylevental
[596] Wikipedia:Tom Clements disambiguation page edit by Ylevental
[597] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement template edit by RHaworth
[598] Wikipedia:Tom Clements disambiguation page edit by RHaworth
[599] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements edit by RHaworth
[600] Wikipedia:Deletion Log for User:Ylevental
[601] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft creation and edit by Ylevental
[602] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft edits by Ylevental
[603] Wikipedia:Talk page of Ylevental edit by PeterTheFourth
[604] Wikipedia:Talk page of Ylevental edit by Ylevental
[605] Wikipedia:TLPG user listing
[606] Wikimedia:TLPG Global account information
[607] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft edit by Buidhe
[608] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft edits by Ylevental
[609] Wikipedia:Thomas Clements draft edit by ToBeFree
[610] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[611] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edits by Ylevental
[612] PubMed: Tribute to Grunya Efimovna Sukhareva, the Woman who First Described Infantile Autism
[613] Wikipedia:Grunya Sukhareva edit by Ylevental
[614] Wikipedia:Thomas A. McKean edit by Ylevental
[615] Wikipedia:Grunya Sukhareva edits by Ylevental
[616] Wikipedia:Grunya Sukhareva edit by Ylevental
[617] Wikipedia:Autism edit by Ylevental
[618] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[619] Wikipedia:Thomas A. McKean edit by Ylevental
[620] Wikipedia:Thomas A. McKean edit by Ylevental
[621] Wikipedia:Thomas A. McKean edit by Ylevental
[622] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[623] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by IP
[624] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[625] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[626] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[627] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[628] Wikipedia:Edward Neumeier edit by Ylevental
[629] Wikipedia:Shain Neumeier
[630] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism creation log
[631] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism revision as of 15:43, 30 January 2019
[632] Wikipedia:Autism Science Foundation edit by Ylevental
[633] Wikipedia:Autism Science Foundation edit by Ylevental
[634] Wikipedia:Autism Science Foundation edit by Ylevental
[635] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement template edit by Ylevental
[636] Wikipedia:Donald Triplett edit by Ylevental
[637] Wikipedia:Donald Triplett talk page edits by Ylevental
[638] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[639] Wikipedia:Talk page of Heepman1997 edit by Ylevental
[640] Wikipedia:Talk page of Heepman1997 edit by Ylevental
[641] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[642] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[643] Wikipedia:Neurodiversity edit by Ylevental
[644] Wikipedia:Neurodiversity edit by Ylevental
[645] Wikipedia:Neurodiversity edit by Mattevansc3
[646] Wikipedia:Neurodiversity edit by Ylevental
[647] Wikipedia:Requests for page protection edit by Ylevental
[648] Wikipedia:Requests for page protection edit by Deepfriedokra
[649] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[650] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Arlandria606
[651] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Qwirkle
[652] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Arlandria606
[653] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[654] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) talk page edit by Ylevental
[655] Wikipedia:Ylevental talk page archive – Bias/Conflict of Interest
[656] Wikipedia:ANI archive – Eyeballs on Jonathan Mitchell (writer)
[657] Wikipedia:Autism rights movement edit by Ylevental
[658] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[659] Wikipedia:Simon Baron-Cohen edit by Ylevental
[660] Wikipedia:Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee edit by Ylevental
[661] Wikipedia:Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee edit by Ylevental
[662] Wikipedia:Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee edit by Ylevental
[663] Wikipedia:Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee edit by IP
[664] Wikipedia:Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee edit by Ylevental
[665] Wikipedia:Help Desk edit by Ylevental
[666] Wikipedia:Help Desk edit by Arch dude
[667] Wikipedia:Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee talk page edit by Ylevental
[668] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[669] Wikipedia:David Miedzianik edit by Ylevental
[670] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[671] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[672] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[673] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[674] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[675] Wikipedia:Neurodiversity talk page – Disruption
[676] Wikipedia:Neurodiversity talk page edit by Ylevental
[677] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism talk page edit by Shannonrosa
[678] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[678] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism talk page edit by Ylevental
[679] Wikipedia:Thomas A. McKean edit by Ylevental
[680] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[681] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[682] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[683] Wikipedia:Southwark Playhouse edits by Ylevental
[684] Wikipedia:Charlie Brooks edit by Ylevental
[685] Wikipedia:Alex Oates edit by Ylevental
[686] Wikipedia:Julia Bascom edit by IP
[687] Wikipedia:Julia Bascom edit by IP
[688] Wikipedia:Julia Bascom talk page edit by IP
[689] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion talk page edit by IP
[690] What is my IP Address geolocation
[691] Google Maps – East Lansing to Highland Park, Michigan
[692] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bascom (2nd nomination)
[693] Wikipedia:Julia Bascom talk page edit by Ylevental
[694] Wikipedia:Alex Oates edit by Ylevental
[695] Wikipedia:Thomas A. McKean edits by Ylevental
[696] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[697] Wikipedia:Jonathan Mitchell (writer) edit by Ylevental
[698] Wikipedia:Julia Bascom edit by Ylevental
[699] Wikipedia:Julia Bascom edit by Ylevental
[700] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism edit by Ylevental
[701] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism talk page edit by Ylevental
[702] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism talk page edit by Ylevental
[703] Wikipedia:Southwark Playhouse edits by Ylevental
[704] Wikipedia:Alex Oates edit by Ylevental
[705] Wikipedia:National Council on Severe Autism talk page edits by Ylevental
[706] US SEC: What we do
[707] Wikipedia:Teahouse questions section
[735] Comment on Autism Gadfly
[736] Change.org: Remove Steve Silberman as the Closing Keynote Speaker from the 47th National Conference.
[737] Change.org: Petition Update – Silberman is still Scheduled to Speak, but Thanks for Your Support
[738] Wrong Planet: Steve Silberman’s response to the petition
[739] Wrong Planet: Fnord confirmed speaking engagement went ahead
[740] Change.org: Remove Steve Silberman as the Keynote Speaker from the Victorian Autism Conference
[741] Phil Gluyas Autism News and Views: Steve Silberman coming to Australia
[742] Dandelion Program: Neurotribes author Steve Silberman headlines AMAZE Victorian Autism Conference VAC2016 (archived)
[743] Yuval Levental profile
[744] Battered Man Syndrome
[745] The media’s coverage of abuse of women vs men
[746] The fantasy of oppressive fat activists
[747] I’ve been inspired by Dan Perrins hunger strike, who can I talk to here about this? (archived)
[748] Anti Misandry (archived)
[749] CBS News: Children with Autism have distinct facial features
[750] Cortical Chavinism: Yuval Levental – Plastic surgery and Autism
[751] Jones K, Smith D (1975). “The fetal alcohol syndrome”. Teratology. 12 (1): 1–10.
[752] A Voice for Men: Love shyness and male privilege
[753] About this You Tube Channel
Autism Enemies 
