Two this morning as promised. This is the first.

I for one do no such thing! Level 3’s don’t disgust me. I want to help them in any way I can. This witch won’t help us given her contempt for us which is totally skewed and misplaced – because she doesn’t understand what Autism actually is! She’s the one drawing a line, and that line is what needs to be erased!

“Learned” and it’s NOT! ALL Autism has a genetic factor and it’s not where you think it is! That’s because geneticists have NO clue as that is not where the genetic link is! It’s the behaviours!

Autism isn’t biological you witch. It is behavioural! That is how it is diagnosed! That is what the DSM-IV and V are about! Like it or not! That is how psychology works!

He didn’t say support you idiot! He said treated equally and with respect! Typical goal post mover to try and make a slanderous point!

We can’t turn Autism off any more than Level 3’s can, you witch! What we can do is adjust, and yes, mask although that is ill advised because of the mental issues that can follow if persisted with! I never passed a job interview for this reason! FACT!!

And you’re openly encouraging it by concentrating the supports on Level 3’s and calling us Level 1’s not disabled! You know what that can cause, you witch? SUICIDE! You have a think about that if you have the guts! (Lucky for you I have a strong enough personality to see through your piss weak bullying!)

No, YOU don’t understand science, because you are mistaking psychology for science (AKA biology as previously mentioned). That is a basic understanding fail right there. And you don’t have the qualifications to come to the conclusion that you have anyway – science or psychology!

And that has no back up in scientific sources, because the genetics in Autism are NOT found in biology!

Lots more to come!

I may have to increase the frequency of these after I collected more links today. I’ll make a decision shortly.

She doesn’t! You’re unhinged thinking that she does! It’s YOU who needs to prevent that and what you are doing online right now is ENCOURAGING it through neglect!

Those people aren’t offensive to her. YOU ARE! What we want you do to is shut and do your job as a mother! For an advocate, you fail miserably!

No, because you are a barefaced liar and want ALL the money for your son! It doesn’t work like that and a real advocate would know that! You don’t. You don’t want anyone to get money they deserve. Suck it up, princess. We deserve it!

We are Autistic too. Accept it, because it’s demonstrable fact! The DSM-IV and V say so as does the Disability Discrimination Act.

Oh yes it is! The DSM-5 precludes intellectual disability in an Autism diagnosis! Even Kanner recognised it that way!

“A” just got slandered there. Autism is NOT elective! So give a you-know-what if you want to be a real advocate!

But you don’t! All you do is attack Level 1 Autistics out of pure envy! You have no dignity at all and you attack the dignity of genuine Autistics at Level 1!

No, she’s offended by your slanderous conduct trying to undiagnose people when you have no qualifications to do so! You’re worried about having any attention taken away from your son, and yet you’re doing exactly that yourself!

Lots more to come!

Here’s the next lot!

Another one where the screenshot clipped the bottom off. This is a clear indication that Mae doesn’t respect the true concept of neurodiversity. ND is the human race. That is a fact, and Autistics are a part of it. Mae wants Autistics away from this – and that is HARMFUL to her son! Monetise my arse!

Look up Sky Walker, you witch!! He killed his mother and he’s Level 3! At least she tried but she didn’t find the key and she didn’t get any help either thanks to the pathetic American health system!

And through proper psychologists and psychiatrists those ones would get an NPD DX whether they want it or not! Genuine Autistics do NOT manipulate unless we have to for self defence – and we don’t like it either! No one claims to actually be like Einstein unless they have the qualifications and knowledge to back that up.

BULLSHIT!! The numbers are NOT like that and you know it! You’re manipulating the numbers for all the wrong reasons and that makes YOU the narcissist! Note that she is doing this only to Level 3 on top of that! IQ’s can’t even be tested properly with them! Anyway – IQ numbers mean nothing. Intelligence is only as good as how you use it.

That’s not what sensory sensitivity is, you moron! We aren’t super humans for crying out loud! My biggest sensor is smelling cigarette smoke from a fair way off, and only because I hate it. I’m even more sensitive when I smell it where I shouldn’t be smelling it – like on a train when it’s illegal. Sensory sensitivity isn’t beneficial if it isn’t adjusted to, and the overloads are the biggest threat to Autistic children – especially toddlers.

That’s ignorance at it’s finest and she’s judging us on results. That’s biased because we suffer from serious discrimination that holds us back – and she wants that to continue! What about your own son, you witch? Huh? It’ll hold him back, especially as he is young enough to be brought up the spectrum! (A reminder – the boy is six years old)

Then leave us alone, you witch! Concentrate on doing your effing job and stop playing the victim – if you have the guts that is! Autism across the spectrum is NOT elective and it is NOT BS!

We hate the ones that do these call outs because it instantly says to us that the child of the person who did the call out is in danger due to neglect! We are REAL disabled people! The LAW says we are disabled! It is right there in the definitions! Read it and get it, you witch! (Boy it is very hard to avoid subbing the “w” for a “b” when I say that!)

Lots more to come!

Here is the next set.

No you are disgusting because that is a sign of disability discrimination! You are in effect approving of bullying of Autistics! That is not on no matter what! And don’t talk about “shit” personalities when you are the poster child for that!

Describing yourself, you witch! Of course people can make it to 70 and not be diagnosed! If someone lives a quiet life and has a great job that fits them – it can happen!

Oh cut it out! There are plenty of people who are confined to a wheelchair for a week! WE ARE NOT ELECTIVE! You are pathetic!

Masking is real, you witch. When you are a parent of the Level 3 you are supposed to be taking care of them!

Another one that I couldn’t fully screenshot. The one who doesn’t understand Autism is YOU! Why? Because you refuse to recognise the Spectrum! The instant you do that, YOU don’t understand what it is, and that is on YOU!

Take your own advice then, you envious little microbe! You are trying to destroy the lives of Level 1’s and for what? It’ll end up costing you your reputation as an advocate and rightly so!

It is NOT a learned behaviour! ALL Autism has it’s base in genetics – no exceptions! But there has been no heretic sequence found in Autism FULL STOP!

NO ONE wants to be disabled, you witch! You are a fool to say that! Oh sure there are rorters but they are found and penalised. Diagnosed Level 1’s are NOT rorters! And you bet everyone who has a DX now would have fulfilled the DSM-IV!

Lots more to come!

Here’s the next lot.

No it’s because of idiots like you lying about disabilities!!

Anxiety to a certain level can in fact prevent all of those things! You have no clue!

There it is again! Slander against Level 1 Autistics! The mother here deserves ZERO sympathy! Murder has NO EXCUSE! At all!

Yes you are! You’re stealing help from your own son by getting in its way!!

Wrong! You hate disabled people who can function better than your son and you refuse to do anything about his functioning levels making the excuse of not enough money!

Sunflower lanyards are earned, you witch! I have one and I earned it!

And people like you have no idea what a disability actually is!

You are in effect preparing your child to be homeless by doing what you’re doing! That will be karma for you unless someone saves your son first! Stop attacking us and start supporting your son PROPERLY!

Lots more to come!

Because I’ll start another verbal riot (even though it takes two) I’m responding to her tweets on Twitter here instead and there are a lot and this is going to take awhile.

That is absolute rubbish because there is no such thing. Neurodiversity just is – brain difference. That is what the dictionary definition says. Mae is behaving like the very elite class she is complaining about, including being immune from criticism.

That is also rubbish. Level 3 is Autism. I have always acknowledged it and so has everyone else. We are not embarrassed by them. We are however embarrassed by parents like this witch who ply their disgraceful narrative. That last crack is misleading to say the least!

No you don’t because you are slamming the door on people who have disabilities! Level 1 Autistics are disabled! It says so by law! If you are so sure someone is claiming benefits illegally – report them! But you won’t will you?

We speak for your kids because they can’t speak for themselves. We understand what ails them because we have the same behaviours – just not as pronounced. Mild is the wrong word to use.

NO ONE wants to gag Level 3 Autistics! This woman is deluded! She is assuming so much out of sheer right wing style paranoia!

I’m annoyed this screenshot was trimmed because I couldn’t do it all. Act out? A child has to have a formal diagnosis to get that concession and it’s not cheating! And it’s also real Autism – level 1 is as real as level 3! Level 3’s are not denied access to learning, except by someone who keeps them at level 3 either recklessly or ignorantly! THAT is real ableism and I’m looking at you, woman!

Because the parents won’t do something about it. This woman is lazy and making excuses.

All of that is rot. Autism is all respects is genetic, not 25 to 30 percent. The New York Times needs to vet its stories better.

Lots more to come!

I was very happy tonight to get a phone call to inform me that an idiot on Twitter (I won’t call it X) came back after a few days de-activated. I was VERY quick to grab screen shots from this pathetic poor excuse for a parent, and she is now on notice for slandering me by imputing that I am a welfare fraud by accusing me of acting and cosplaying the role of an Autistic. Have a look at this “verbal riot” for yourself, and apologies for my language because this witch just set me off something absolutely chronic!! This is a long entry of course because some of these screenshots are huge!

My reply to this – Level 1 is NOT a lifestyle choice! It is a forced human difference that can NOT be erased! It has to be adjusted to! We are gifted with skills that we need to adjust to use, and in childhood as well. That’s why I missed out because of the late diagnosis. FACT! We are also a special class – all of us, including your son!

From the red arrow;

Next;

From the green arrow;

From the red arrow;

From the orange arrow;

From the blue arrow;

Next;

My reply to this (which will be posted after I upload this entry) is the link to this blog entry.

From the green arrow;

From the orange arrow;

My reply to this – you imputed it, which is enough under defamation law. As I already said before, we are entitled because under the Disability Discrimination Act we are disabled. The definition in the Act makes that crystal clear! It is about every person, including me!

From the red arrow;

And from the above we go to the grey arrow;

From the brown arrow;

From the maroon arrow;

And from the light green arrow;

As you can see, this one just isn’t getting it and presents a threat to the whole Autistic community by try to promote Level 1 Autism as nothing. It is NOT nothing as I can attest to. It cost me two jobs – the first because I couldn’t adjust and they wouldn’t let me (this was pre diagnosis) leading me to resign for the sake of my mental health. The second I was fired when I was diagnosed because they didn’t want me around. They refused to employ an Autistic – a regular occurrence as everyone with a brain knows and it has to be stopped. And yet this witch wants it to continue by eliminating our rightful diagnosis.

She is on notice. No apology – I will be giving serious consideration to filing in the Federal Court against Twitter (X) to get her contact details. That has a precedent which I can use. Once I get that I can sue her for defamation.

The other option of course – and this would be easier – is if the current review of the Disability Discrimination Act allows the additions recommended by the Disability Royal Commission to section 39 of the DDA. This is absolutely offensive conduct AND vilification on the basis of a disability and unlike in defamation the victim does not have to be named as long as the identity fits – in this case ASD1.

I’m also not convinced that she sent a letter to the Minister. If she did, it will be ignored because her claims are baseless and completely against the facts.

The tweet I am about to quote was what reminded me that I already had an entry in the chute about this poor excuse of a human being.

Do I care if someone fakes autism or self-diagnoses? No.
Do I care if self-diagnosis becomes widely accepted or if studies include participants without a diagnosis? Yes.

Do I care if someone falsely claims autism or gets diagnosed through questionable sources? No.
Do I care if misdiagnoses distort prevalence data and fuel misinformation? Yes.

Do I care if someone with autism calls it an identity, diversity, or superpower? No.
Do I care if institutions promote autism as an identity, diversity, or superpower? Yes.

Do I care if someone claims diagnostic criteria are biased? No.
Do I care if the DSM changes criteria to favor groups over clinical evidence? Yes.

Do I care if someone writes a book on neurodiversity? No.
Do I care if that book is treated as fact or becomes a bestseller? Yes.

Do I care if someone calls themselves “neurodivergent”? No.
Do I care if professionals replace “autism” with “neurodivergent”? Yes.

Do I care if someone avoids the term “Asperger’s”? No.
Do I care if people pressure others to abandon clinical terms over rumors? Yes.

Do I care if a woman claims late or missed diagnosis due to her sex? No.
Do I care if women falsely claim autism criteria only apply to white boys or differ by sex? Yes.

Do I care if someone can’t afford an autism assessment? No.
Do I care if large groups promote self-diagnosis due to assessment costs? Yes.

Do I care if someone says they’re both gay and autistic? No.
Do I care if people claim there’s a connection between the two? Yes.

Do I care if someone has a platform based on self-diagnosis? No.
Do I care if that platform gains a massive following? Yes.

Do I care if someone with autism speaks about their condition? No.
Do I care if they claim expertise solely based on their diagnosis? Yes.

Do I care if someone shares misinformation about autism symptoms? No.
Do I care if that misinformation gains significant attention, like 100,000 likes? Yes.
Venus @Venu5angelica on January 13, 2025 at 2:26pm AEDST

The thing about all of these is simple – if you answer one thing Yes or No, the follow up should be the same! And yet in each and every instance here it’s the opposite every single time! Venus is inconsistent. She is in fact confused, and this is a really good example of someone who needs help. She says she is a “Woman disabled by Asperges[sic] Autism”. No, she is disabled by her attitude. Asperger’s and/or Autism are only disabling if you let it be, or if someone else makes it so and you let them either do it and/or get away with it. The only exception is when one is a level 3 Autistic or in some instances level 2 – and even then it is possible to make things as best as possible.

Mind you, some of these aren’t really connected to each other and yet she tries to claim a connection. That in upon itself is a consistency issue.

I did this entry for two reasons (and then forgetting about it until I started on the second which follows this one). First – I can’t list this person as an enemy because I don’t know her real name. Two – she blocked me on Twitter so I can’t respond there. Here is how it started;

If you can control your autism symptoms, you do not have autism. Masking is a myth, it is impossible to control how the symptoms of a neurodevelopmental disorder manifest. By definition, if symptoms are not observable, they are not present.

Logic is clear: claiming to suppress autism symptoms means admitting to consciously displaying them, as the same mechanism is required to display or conceal. This is not masking, it is faking autism.

Law of Non-Contradiction: A person cannot both have involuntary autism symptoms and consciously suppress them at the same time.

Law of Identity: Autism is defined by specific, involuntary symptoms; controlling them means it is not autism.

Law of the Excluded Middle: Symptoms are either present and involuntary (autism) or consciously controlled (not autism) there is no middle ground.
Venus @Venu5angelica on January 6, 2025 at 11:55am AEDST

Total and utter rubbish. You don’t understand the Autistic Spectrum and its multiple levels (spectrum). There is middle ground whether you like it or not. Practical irrevocable FACT!!
Phil Gluyas on January 6, 2025 at 10:48pm AEDST

She did reply but she deleted it after I replied. If I remember she said something like symptoms being “involuntarily” just briefly.

The higher the functioning the better ability to adjust to it. That is masking/camouflage. And the word is involuntary by the way. It can be reduced. Do not say it can’t because you would be wrong!
Phil Gluyas on January 6, 2025 at 10:53pm AEDST

When the reply was deleted, that was when she blocked me. A complete and utter coward. But an old friend was also about and he put her in her place even better than I ever could!

I can not take seriously anyone with this sort of bullshit idea of autism. In all the two and a half decades of researching autism, I have never once found research that supports this fucking idea at all. This is a total abuse of logic. It is also an abuse of autistic people.
David N. Andrews MEd CPSE @DavidAndrewsRSP on January 7, 2025 at 10:40pm AEDST

Why is it an abuse of autistic people? Simple: the writer completely ignores the research on behaviour, what brings it about and what maintains it. It also ignores what is known about the behaviour of autistic people, and has been written purely as an exclusionary tactic.
David N. Andrews MEd CPSE @DavidAndrewsRSP on January 7, 2025 at 10:43pm AEDST

Why is it an abuse of logic?

Again – simple. Logic does not make the decision on this: DATA DOES!

I had thought better of this person. After seeing this – I cannot trust that person to not fuck with anything I tell her.

Very fucking disappointed.
David N. Andrews MEd CPSE @DavidAndrewsRSP on January 7, 2025 at 10:45pm AEDST

I couldn’t have done a better job in owning that witch. I haven’t seen David for some time – he was about in the early years on my fight with John Best. I can’t remember when I saw him last.

Due to the domination of the subject of Jonathan Mitchell in the blog entries here I have put them on a new blog.

About

The entries here will be progressively deleted or redirect to the new location if I have linked them elsewhere.